Goal Caufield50
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2007
- 853
- 282
ExactlyHe had good center in Chicago. What makes u think he will do better here
ExactlyHe had good center in Chicago. What makes u think he will do better here
Considering none of our other third line wingers dicided to show up this year(or second line wingers, for that matter), I'd say its a need. Our middle six has scored a whopping 3 goals this year, one of which was an empty netter.
I’m more of a fan of reading your posts than your username.not a fan of reading usernames are you?
Ive never once said Tuomisto was a sure thing. I’m saying that CURRENTLY Hronek, Cholo, Seider, Mcaisaac, Lindstron and Tuomisto are above Regula. So yes I have absolutely no issue with trading a guy who is around 12-14th on the depth chart. To make the team, he would have to become better than each of those 6 prospects as well as whatever other players they sign over the next 3-5 years. The odds a 3rd rounder ever makes the NHL is low.
Perlini is a 23yo, former 12th overall pick with untapped potential and they traded essentially a 3rd round pick for him. I have no issue with this very little risk- potential medium reward.
Again, if he becomes a 20goal scorer then he’s (sadly) one of our better wingers until our prospects are ready, which as of now players like Zadina, Valeno, Ras, etc haven’t shown. Young 20 goal scorers are absolutely worth a 3rd and valuable assets.
I’m more of a fan of reading your posts than your username.
Perlini isn’t a 20 goal scorer now (he’s a scratch for a bad team) and that would be his ceiling at this point. If we are only looking at ceilings then you just traded a quality 2nd pair DMAN which the Wings desperately need for or a player who has no future with the team. I wouldn’t trade any of Z, Veleno or Ras for him either.
Winning is not a need and even if it was is Perlini a contributor on a winning team? He never has been. He was a scratch for a not very good Hawks team. With some luck he might be a marginal upgrade on Hirose? Maybe Svech has the same chance if you played him more than 8 minutes a game. Smith or Kuffner could be that guy. I don’t see Perlini as a huge upgrade. I don’t think any of them really matter when it comes down to winning. Regula has potential to be contributing to winning when this team is ready to win.Considering none of our other third line wingers dicided to show up this year(or second line wingers, for that matter), I'd say its a need. Our middle six has scored a whopping 3 goals this year, one of which was an empty netter.
Keep focusing on Regula’s floor and Perlini’s ceiling. Hope it makes you feel better about this trade.of course you wouldn’t trade any of them for him because they have elite potential.
instead we traded a 3rd round pick, which has about a 10% chance of ever even playing in the NHL, for potentially 20 goals.
well worth this risk.
Keep focusing on Regula’s floor and Perlini’s ceiling. Hope it makes you feel better about this trade.
Yes, this is a losing season for us but if we're going on 8+ game losing streaks the whole season it's going to be bad for our young players' development.
Based on what? The long NHL history of good players continuing to develop on bad teams? Or is this where we point at Edmonton and pretend that it was the organization losing games that was really the cause of Yakupov not being a star, and not the fact that he just wasn't a particularly good hockey player? Are you really going to suggest that, say, Brady Tkachuk is already doomed, simply by virtue of the Senators not winning many games? Did Mackinnon's development get irreversibly destroyed by the 2016 season?
Wow really jumping to a lot of extreme conclusions there my guy. I didn't say "irreversibly destroyed," or "doomed," I said bad for development.
So, not going to address that that statement ('bad for development') is either baseless or an outright falsehood? Ok.
What's your endgame here man? I think losing 8+ games in a row and giving up 5 goals a game while barely managing to score a goal will take a toll on a player's mentality. I think attempting to add secondary scoring so we don't lose as badly or as often is a good move. You're welcome to think otherwise.
Guaranteed NHL player? Yeah you can be forced to play him, doesn't mean he's an nhl player. Perlini needs top six minutes and very good linemates to even coming close to producing anything. He is a ghost in a bottom six support or checking role. Truly a tweener. Doesn't have the tools for bottom 6, and not good enough to be a top six player. He will flame out to Europe within a year or twoWe have a guaranteed NHL player who’s still young with high untapped potential for a 3rd rd pick who statistically has about a 10% chance of sniffing the NHL and is behind 6-7 of our young prospect D already.
I feel just fine about this trade, because it’s completely inconsequential because no pieces will have any huge impact on the team but we got the piece with a slightly higher ceiling
Guaranteed nhl player whos been a healthy scratch. Pretty sure hes got 10% of an nhl career ahead of him,not this high untapped potential you’ve convinced yourself ofWe have a guaranteed NHL player who’s still young with high untapped potential for a 3rd rd pick who statistically has about a 10% chance of sniffing the NHL and is behind 6-7 of our young prospect D already.
I feel just fine about this trade, because it’s completely inconsequential because no pieces will have any huge impact on the team but we got the piece with a slightly higher ceiling
its the problem most HF posters have when they dont actually watch the players and only look at stat lines.Guaranteed nhl player whos been a healthy scratch. Pretty sure hes got 10% of an nhl career ahead of him,not this high untapped potential you’ve convinced yourself of
Not a fan of this trade. I honestly don't like Regula very much as a prospect. Precisely the style of defenseman I don't want... But he was still a decent prospect. I just don't see how Perlini does anything for us though. Would have preferred a 5th round pick or something.
Guaranteed NHL player? Yeah you can be forced to play him, doesn't mean he's an nhl player. Perlini needs top six minutes and very good linemates to even coming close to producing anything. He is a ghost in a bottom six support or checking role. Truly a tweener. Doesn't have the tools for bottom 6, and not good enough to be a top six player. He will flame out to Europe within a year or two
Guaranteed nhl player whos been a healthy scratch. Pretty sure hes got 10% of an nhl career ahead of him,not this high untapped potential you’ve convinced yourself of
My "end game" is to have people stop repeating this nonsense. It started with the "losing mentality" garbage when the team was first missing the playoffs, and now, god forbid they lose a few games or all of the players will regress/develop poorly. Both directly contradicted by literally years of evidence to the contrary.
You're welcome to close your eyes, plug up your ears and try to pretend otherwise, if you'd like. Or you can answer the very, very simple questions I asked in the first response to you and find your way to the right answer on your own.
Well take the risk and enjoy him for the next 18 months , you can follow him in the swiss league afterwards and watch him get his 20 goals. Im sure hawks fans will have more fun watching regula play with boqvist20 goals is a high untapped potential? Much rather take a risk on a guy who’s scored at 20 goal paces before then a 3rd rd pick with about a 10% chance of having any NHL career. Plenty of healthy scratches have had great careeer
Well take the risk and enjoy him for the next 18 months , you can follow him in the swiss league afterwards and watch him get his 20 goals. Im sure hawks fans will have more fun watching regula play with boqvist