Player Discussion David Backes V

Status
Not open for further replies.

BigGoalBrad

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
9,908
2,684
It’s tough when you have a guy play a great game and the next look like he shouldn’t be in the NHL. No one is expecting him to be a 6 mil a year guy just a solid 3rd liner these playoffs.
 

Johnny4778

Registered User
Jan 26, 2006
4,017
2,595
It’s tough when you have a guy play a great game and the next look like he shouldn’t be in the NHL. No one is expecting him to be a 6 mil a year guy just a solid 3rd liner these playoffs.
Yup wish Marchand, pasta, Bergeron were playing liking solid 1st liners too
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lady Rhian

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,225
7,764
Maine
Yup wish Marchand, pasta, Bergeron were playing liking solid 1st liners too
Whataboutism (also known as Whataboutery) is a red herring version of the classic tu quoque logical fallacy - sometimes implementing the balance fallacy as well - which is employed as a propaganda technique. It is used as a diversionary tactic to shift the focus off of an issue and avoid having to directly address it. This technique works by twisting criticism back onto the critic and in doing so revealing the original critic's hypocrisy.

They have their own threads.
 

Johnny4778

Registered User
Jan 26, 2006
4,017
2,595
Whataboutism (also known as Whataboutery) is a red herring version of the classic tu quoque logical fallacy - sometimes implementing the balance fallacy as well - which is employed as a propaganda technique. It is used as a diversionary tactic to shift the focus off of an issue and avoid having to directly address it. This technique works by twisting criticism back onto the critic and in doing so revealing the original critic's hypocrisy.

They have their own threads.
Ok, BACKES has played as good as Marchand, Pasta, Bergeron in his limited time relatively speaking???? That better? Work for the thread?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lady Rhian

LSCII

Cup driven
Mar 1, 2002
50,511
22,016
Central MA
Yet he is not the worse bruin in the series? Laid the biggest hit last game and played 4 minutes. Has 1 giveaway. Led the team in hits in game 2 and setup the first goal. So game 2 the only style of game/play that will take this team anywhere he was the leader. The **** show we have been seeing with Marchand and pasta give the puck away all game, no work ethic by most players and this constant fear of the leafs speed is what is losing this series not David Backes

I think the really obvious question for you is if he's been so solid, why did he only get 4 minutes last game? We both know the answer, which means you won't respond, but it's true. He got 4 minutes because he's a f***ing liability.
 

Johnny4778

Registered User
Jan 26, 2006
4,017
2,595
I think the really obvious question for you is if he's been so solid, why did he only get 4 minutes last game? We both know the answer, which means you won't respond, but it's true. He got 4 minutes because he's a ****ing liability.
Lead the team in hits with 4 minutes. Leader on team in series in plus minus ? I’d say our coach decided we need to match Toronto’s speed? Got us the win right?
 

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,225
7,764
Maine
There is no point of being hard on the guy

But Kuhlman and Nordstrom were the right insertions in the lineup

kind of surprised Wagner was the guy to sit, but that looks like was the right move as well. Acciari played a solid game
True, I actually like Backes as a person so I shouldn’t be knocking him. Just got caught up in some ridiculous posts.

Kuhlman was great today, he’ll definitely be playing Tuesday.
 

rocketdan9

Registered User
Feb 5, 2009
20,411
13,210
True, I actually like Backes as a person so I shouldn’t be knocking him. Just got caught up in some ridiculous posts.

Kuhlman was great today, he’ll definitely be playing Tuesday.

We are all guilty of this!

yes, I think this lineup today will stay in tact for game 7

Just got to play the same way. This is the kind of Bruins hockey I'm familiar with
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mainehockey33

sarge88

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 29, 2003
25,474
20,892
True, I actually like Backes as a person so I shouldn’t be knocking him. Just got caught up in some ridiculous posts.

Kuhlman was great today, he’ll definitely be playing Tuesday.

I truly wonder what the average number of players used among SC winners is.

I mean, it’s clear that teams use well over 20 guys en route to the cup.

We’re talking 4-5 weeks and 16 - 28 games of hockey.

Nordstrom and Kuhlman played today and did a great job.

That doesn’t mean that Wagner and Backes will never see the ice again and can’t be effective and important.
 
Last edited:

Over the volcano

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
34,259
18,635
Watertown
...

Kuhlman was great today, he’ll definitely be playing Tuesday.
Man it is so obvious he needed to sit all series. What a difference.

...
Nordstrom and Kuhlman played today and did s great job.

That doesn’t mean that Wagner and Backes will never see the ice again and can’t be effective and important.
Thought they both struggled pretty mightily, Johansson too - but it was good to see Cassidy confident in his lines none the less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnny4778

GloryDaze4877

Barely Irrelevant
Jun 27, 2006
44,395
13,873
The Sticks (West MA)
I truly wonder what the average number of players used among SC winners is.

I mean, it’s clear that teams use well over 20 guys en route to the cup.

We’re talking 4-5 weeks and 16 - 28 games of hockey.

Nordstrom and Kuhlman played today and did s great job.

That doesn’t mean that Wagner and Backes will never see the ice again and can’t be effective and important.

I could actually see Cassidy wanting to get Backes (and Wagner) out there for Game 7 because of their experience.

I think a 4th line of:

52-42-14

Could be effective.
 

sarge88

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 29, 2003
25,474
20,892
I could actually see Cassidy wanting to get Backes (and Wagner) out there for Game 7 because of their experience.

I think a 4th line of:

52-42-14

Could be effective.

Definitely.

I’d also not be surprised if the same lineup wins by 3 or loses by 3.

These teams are so evenly matched I truly wouldn’t bet a dollar either way,
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lady Rhian

GloryDaze4877

Barely Irrelevant
Jun 27, 2006
44,395
13,873
The Sticks (West MA)
Definitely.

I’d also not be surprised if the same lineup wins by 3 or loses by 3.

These teams are so evenly matched I truly wouldn’t bet a dollar either way,

I would not be surprised either.

One thing that could influence the decision making by Cassidy is the PK? Acciari had almost 3 minutes of SH TOI, and Nordstrom was over a minute. Wagner could probably take those minutes?
 

sarge88

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 29, 2003
25,474
20,892
I would not be surprised either.

One thing that could influence the decision making by Cassidy is the PK? Acciari had almost 3 minutes of SH TOI, and Nordstrom was over a minute. Wagner could probably take those minutes?

To be honest, gun to my head as far as my comfort level goes among those three among PK ability goes, they’re pretty equal in my book.

I’d probably keep the forwards the same on Tuesday.

I might switch out Grizz for Clifton if he was healthy though.

Not giving up on Grizz, but he could use a game off and I like the nasty that CC can bring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMC

GloryDaze4877

Barely Irrelevant
Jun 27, 2006
44,395
13,873
The Sticks (West MA)
To be honest, gun to my head as far as my comfort level goes among those three among PK ability goes, they’re pretty equal in my book.

I’d probably keep the forwards the same on Tuesday.

I might switch out Grizz for Clifton if he was healthy though.

Not giving up on Grizz, but he could use a game off and I like the nasty that CC can bring.

I think Moore is better on the left also.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sarge88
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad