Starsdude
Registered User
I tried this once before with no response. Can anyone who has seen Shawn Belle tell me how he compares with Trevor daley?
Starsdude said:I tried this once before with no response. Can anyone who has seen Shawn Belle tell me how he compares with Trevor daley?
Matt MacInnis said:That's a pretty lofty, unsubstantiated, claim db23. That sort of thing really shouldn't be tolerated by the mods.
Anyhow...I would take Belle in a heartbeat over Daley. I think Belle is one of the greatly under-appreciated talents in junior hockey right now. The guy is built like a truck, skates like the wind, has good hockey skills....the only problem with him is that he doesn't have good hockey sense.
Belle has the potential to be one of the premier talents among defencemen in my opinion down the road if he can just get a good head put on top of his massive frame.
Reveille said:I think Belle has one of the biggest upsides in the entire hockey league if he can ever put it all together. Thing is, I don't think he will. Even if he becomes half of his upside he can be a great 3/4 d-man. But the sky really is his limit.
moosefan said:I agree about Belle having one of the biggest upsides on defense, at that size with those raw skills and jets for skates how many d-men can optain all that, but the way he thinks the game out is beyond me, he has trouble understanding simple plays at times it seems like. Daley I just find a great talent with super skating as well and he is alot for aware on the ice and is much less raw. I just like Daley alot more.
Reveille said:On that two number rating system I'd give:
Daley: 7 9
Belle: 9 4
Ott = Snott said:What makes Daley's potential such a fair bit lower than Belle's highest possible upside? They both posses the same strenghts, only where Belle has more size, Daley has tons of more hockey sense. And so far, Daley's size has yet to become a problem. He either fights through it (he weighs over 205 pounds) or skates his way out of it. Daley could need some work on his defensive game perhaps, but that's a lot easier to learn than hockeysense which is nearly impossible to learn.
I'd rate them;
Trevor Daley ... 7.5 - 8.5
Shawn Belle .... 7.5 - 5.0
Reveille said:Belle has some of the slickest skills with a puck that I've seen on a d-man. Problem is he's very dumb in his own end and makes some reallll bonehead plays. He has some of the most natural talent I've seen.
Daley is a great, all around d-man. He'll be a solid guy. But his natural/raw skill is no where near Belle's IMO. But he's also a much safer bet.
Belle has the potential, IMO, to be one of the best defenseman in the league if he can put it all together. Daley has the potential to be a good #2/3/4 when all is said and done. I don't think he'll be a #2 (that's more of his highest top end) but we'll see.
With Belle, he can become anything he wants to be. THe sky is the limit.
Ott = Snott said:Fair enough.. You've seen them play more than I have..
Has Belle shown any signs of improvement regarding his hockey sense though? And what are the chances of him ever getting some?
Reveille said:I don't think he's shown much improvement in juniors, really. I'd say a slight one, I guess. He made a few less errors this year and seemed to be able to read the plays a bit better. Nothing drastic, though.
I'd say if they have a great coach in the AHL (I'm not familiar with the Utah system that much coaching-wise), than he can be helped. But they better be ready for a big, long project with him. But he has some damn fine potential. All the luck to him, and I hope there is a chance!
Ott = Snott said:Well, no more Utah for him. The Stars now share their affiliate with the Montreal Canadiens, no idea about their management though.
Thanks a bunch though, Reveille.