Dale Tallon: Panthers lose "between 28 to 30 million dollars per year"

boredmale

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 13, 2005
42,431
6,996
I remember when Charles Wang would cry poverty when he was with the Islanders, I always felt like he fudged the numbers using an accountant to make it seem worse then it was(ie it's sort of unfair not to count the 20M TV contract they have with MSG when you try to state how much money you lost)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeyMike01

BruinsBtn

Registered User
Dec 24, 2006
22,080
13,546
Hockey teams are terrible investments from a P&L perspective, even the great teams. But they're still an amazing investment overall because there are only 150 professional sports teams in North America and a lot more billionaires who are looking to buy a new plaything and want to compete for one of the few things that money can't buy (a Stanley Cup).
 

WeDislikeEich

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
5,887
4,214
I read somewhere that Viola is all in to create a winner in order to see if southern Florida is a viable hockey market or not. This makes me think it’s true,

If he spends all this money on Q and potentially Bob+panarin, start winning more and revenue still doesn’t increase, I think you could see talk of a potential move in the coming years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,148
138,179
Bojangles Parking Lot
It wouldn’t surprise me if that number is before revenue sharing or some other sort of money

Namely, arena money. Hockey operations are only one part of their revenue.

I don’t think there’s a chance in hell that the overall bottom line for that ownership group is -$30M. Business owners don’t just sit on losses like that and yell “gimme more where that came from!”. Tallon is talking about the one piece of the business he’s familiar with, but there’s a bigger picture at play.
 

DesertPenguin

Registered User
Apr 22, 2015
3,073
1,588
As an owner in a small market you either spend to the cap and hope that icing a competitive team year after year brings the fans, or you slash and burn to live off revenue sharing and the die hards that will watch hockey no matter the in ice product, or want to root for the away team.

Penguins were the latter for several years, and have switched to the former with great results. I think Arizona could do the same, but need an arena closer to civilization than Glendale. FLA? It seems like in a city as big as Miami, with presumably a strong snow bird contingent, they should be able to make it work.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,607
16,961
Mulberry Street
As an owner in a small market you either spend to the cap and hope that icing a competitive team year after year brings the fans, or you slash and burn to live off revenue sharing and the die hards that will watch hockey no matter the in ice product, or want to root for the away team.

Penguins were the latter for several years, and have switched to the former with great results. I think Arizona could do the same, but need an arena closer to civilization than Glendale. FLA? It seems like in a city as big as Miami, with presumably a strong snow bird contingent, they should be able to make it work.

PIT also won a lottery for a generational player and happened to draft the 3rd or 4th best player of this era as well. Can't exxactly bank on that happening.

They were also lucky Lemieux took ownership. I dont think Doan or Stephen Weiss want to own their former teams.

All due respect to Panthers fans who live in the area but I think they may end up in Quebec by 2025.

Hockey teams are terrible investments from a P&L perspective, even the great teams. But they're still an amazing investment overall because there are only 150 professional sports teams in North America and a lot more billionaires who are looking to buy a new plaything and want to compete for one of the few things that money can't buy (a Stanley Cup).

This why Ballmer dropped 2 billion on the Clippers and threw franchise values into a tailspin. He wanted to be apart of the exclusive sports owner club, was a basketball fanboy and had too much money to spend.
 

BruinsBtn

Registered User
Dec 24, 2006
22,080
13,546
PIT also won a lottery for a generational player and happened to draft the 3rd or 4th best player of this era as well. Can't exxactly bank on that happening.

They were also lucky Lemieux took ownership. I dont think Doan or Stephen Weiss want to own their former teams.

All due respect to Panthers fans who live in the area but I think they may end up in Quebec by 2025.



This why Ballmer dropped 2 billion on the Clippers and threw franchise values into a tailspin. He wanted to be apart of the exclusive sports owner club, was a basketball fanboy and had too much money to spend.

Ballmer is the most-hilarious story. He was such an incompetent CEO that his personal shares of Microsoft rose $2 billion on the day he announced he was quitting. The Clippers were basically a gift to him for retirement.
 

Lebowski

El Duderino
Dec 5, 2010
17,585
5,218
Hockey teams are terrible investments from a P&L perspective, even the great teams. But they're still an amazing investment overall because there are only 150 professional sports teams in North America and a lot more billionaires who are looking to buy a new plaything and want to compete for one of the few things that money can't buy (a Stanley Cup).

Sorry, what? There's plenty of teams that generate positive cash flows, and even for the teams that do lose money, the franchises value just keep rising yty which can make even non-profitable teams a worthwhile investment by the time the owner wants to resell the team.

For example, the Molson family bought the Habs for 500M in 2009. Forbes recently valued the Habs franchise at 1.3B$ 10 years later.

Even ignoring the operating income, you're looking at a 160% yield over 10 years, which is roughly a 10% increase in value per year.

And again, that's ignoring the operating income of the franchise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe Sakic

BruinsBtn

Registered User
Dec 24, 2006
22,080
13,546
Sorry, what? There's plenty of teams that generate positive cash flows, and even for the teams that do lose money, the franchises value just keep rising yty which can make even non-profitable teams a worthwhile investment by the time the owner wants to resell the team.

For example, the Molson family bought the Habs for 500M in 2009. Forbes recently valued the Habs franchise to 1.3B$ 10 years later.

Even ignoring the operating income, you're looking at a 160% yield over 10 years, which is roughly a 10% increase in value per year.

And again, that's ignoring the operating income of the franchise.

Positive cash flows don't make for a great investment at all. If you're earnings are $10m on a $600m investment, that's a horrific investment. Your second sentence literally repeats exactly what I said. Did you even read beyond the part you bolded? Maybe go back and do that.
 

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,368
7,459
Visit site
In 25 years, they've been to the playoffs 5 times, winning in the 1st round only once, 23 years ago. A kid born when they played the Avs graduated college last year.

Yeah, most franchises aren't going to be the Leafs. Most places, especially the non-college football world in Florida, you have to win to bring people in. When 80% of your history is irrelevance, it's tough to get people to watch. The Panthers have also never had the luxury that Toronto had in 87-88, when they were 21-49-10, but made the playoffs anyway. Even the SE division as a whole never did anything like that.

It's an uphill battle, no question about that.
 

Lebowski

El Duderino
Dec 5, 2010
17,585
5,218
Positive cash flows don't make for a great investment at all. If you're earnings are $10m on a $600m investment, that's a horrific investment. Your second sentence literally repeats exactly what I said. Did you even read beyond the part you bolded? Maybe go back and do that.

Perhaps misunderstood.

What's the point of assessing whether acquiring a franchise is worthwhile or not while ignoring the single biggest contributor as to why acquiring a franchise is a worthwhile investment in the first place?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad