suprafastcelica
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2006
- 336
- 157
Shore couldn't have been used as a sweetener in a package for a top 6 player?
Worse contract, worse production, much older. I don't like Shore but this seems odd.
Change for the sake of change. Shaking up the roster to try and wake guys up.Shore couldn't have been used as a sweetener in a package for a top 6 player?
Worse contract, worse production, much older. I don't like Shore but this seems odd.
Change for the sake of change. Shaking up the roster to try and wake guys up.
It was a fourth liner traded for a fourth liner. Nill again goes the path of least resistance when it comes to making changes.
Does Cogliano still have his wheels
We got the better player I thinkLost a step, but still fairly quick
Dont get how we didnt get a 5th with taking the extra term and older player
We got the better player I think
Anaheim board isn’t all that happy about it. Shore is a 24 year old that is one pace for less than a 10 goal season- I am okay with adding a locker room presence to this bunch.
Probably tried Ritchie and they said “Hell no, one Ritchie is enough”
Besides Ritchie I wonder who else is on the block
I'd assume nearly everyone that is not on our top line or top 2 d pairings
Yeah that's fair, but who has any value lol
Spezza meh
Nuke probably not
Pitlick very little
Hanzal LOLLOL
Ritchie see above
Comeau also see above
I dont see them moving Dick, Faksa, Hintz or Janmark right now. Maybe they'd consider moving Faksa and having Dick be our defensive C
It's unfortunate that Shore was probably our most valuable young piece that was available. Now I'm not sure how well we can put together a package deal with someone like Nichushkin at the heart of it