thinkwild said:
I think this is why the current system works in theory I in the Eye. We dont need to steer them in that direction any more. A framework is created where that is in their best interest. I dont mind Detroits trying to sign Niedermayer because I dont think its unfair to the overall system. They have just as good a chance in the next 10 years in my opinion by dumping all their expensive players for picks and prospects and developing again. This may work too. But it is no surer a path. And an expensive one. But the framework ensures it isnt an unfair advantage so we shouldnt need to enforce changes to legislate doing the smart thing. As long as we have provided a different but equal way of accomplishing the same thing. That is the more important part to preserve I think
I agree that the current system works
in theory... I imagine that the NHL and Bettman agrees as well - thus agreeing to the old CBA... But the problem is, it doesn't work
in reality... and IMO, that's only because the owners don't make it work... The teams (as a whole) need direction and leadership... Allow teams to implement the strategy
however they like... Allow teams to decide for themselves when it's time to hold on with the current team, or when it's time to rebuild... But for god sake,
make sure that each team is following the same good strategy framework... If every team followed the 'cycle to success', I'm convinced that the NHL could survive in every current market - and thrive in the vast majority of markets... I'm convinced that the NHL would be looking at expansion and there would be no talk of contraction...
From where I sit, I see the large majority of the teams trying to follow Colorodo or Detroit's strategy
now (of spending - and often, of overspending - to get 'cream of the crop' players who are available)... I see the majority of teams seeing Detroit and Colorodo as great teams, and teams in the market for good, established, and perhaps superstar players - and the other teams (most guilty, mediocre teams) feel that to be successful, they
must also be in the market for similar players... I see the large majority of teams failing to realize that the
fundamental reason Colorodo and Detroit had (and continue to have) success is because of a properly and slowly developed 'core' from a young player age...
When you have the
majority of teams spending - and overspending - and trying to spend (but the only reason they don't spend more is because they can't afford it) to acquire player personnel, it is only a matter of time before salaries escalate at a dangerous pace when compared to revenue... (with a demand of 20 to 30 teams, and a supply of 1 individual player - the end price for that player is a lot higher than if it's a demand of 5 teams)... From where I sit, the majority of teams are brainwashed into thinking that DET's and COL's strategy
now - of acquiring whenever available, very good to great to superstar veteran, established players - that
this is how they will achieve success (like DET or COL)...
From my perspective, the majority of teams are failing to consider the evolution of DET and COL's franchise the past decade - but rather, they are narrow-mindingly considering them now...
IMO, Anaheim being in the market for Fedorov is terrible for the game (in both a hockey and an economic sense)... In an economic sense, it's not allowing the salary market to naturally correct itself (instead of only a few teams being in the market for Fedorov - we have the majority of teams being in the market for Fedorov - and those that aren't in the market, mostly aren't because they can't afford him)... DET and COL worked hard to get to where they are... They worked hard to be in a position to acquire (and retain) a player like Fedorov... Because DET's core grew up together, Fedorov even fits in the team's salary structure (and it would have even better if Carolina didn't drive it up)... What business does ANA have raising the bidding price for Fedorov... What business does ANA have disrupting their team salary structure... If Fedorov makes $8 million... What is Sykora going to ask for next time his contract is up for renewal? What if Sykora played twice as well as Fedorov, and contributed to the team twice as much... Do what teammates get paid not also affect salary? IMO, of course it does... It happens in every industry, every work setting... What others are getting paid in your office helps determine what you will get paid... Your contributions, skills, and outputs are compared to that of your direct peers - and your compensation is determined accordingly... For a comparable job, if you were making less than someone who performed far worse then you, would you ask for more next time your contract was up? I would... Who wouldn't...
And what other comparable workers in
other offices are getting paid, helps determine what you will get paid in
your office...
If Sykora was able to get millions more in his office, this definitely can impact what Naslund will ask to get paid in our office...
And in order to pay for the expensive Anaheim team, Anaheim now must make the playoffs... They can't afford to allow their team to naturally, slowly, and correctly grow...
Thus, clutch-and-grab trap hockey...
If Anaheim (and the majority of medicore and poor teams) woke up and realized that they are not close to elite - and thus, they shouldn't try to employ the same strategy as the 'aging elite' - then IMO, the league problems would for the most part naturally correct itself...
If there isn't steady improvement from year-to-year for 3 to 4 years, then IMO, that's a good sign that a re-build needs to be done... Perhaps not from scratch - but take things a few steps back (like the Canucks did in Burke's second arrival)... But acquiring a player like Fedorov is not going to fix things... and it is going to cause a whole lot of problems in the process...
my $02