Thenameless
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2014
- 3,855
- 1,788
I'd say that it's about 50/50 that he passes Lemieux in points. He'd have to stay relatively injury free the rest of the way, and play into at least his late 30's though.
High end players usually don't hang them up early. They play until the Wheels fall off or they get a serious injury that forces them to retire.
And just look at some of the guys on that list:
Justin Williams 300 Points after 31. Never known as a elite forward and is still playing...
Chris Kunitz 371 Points after 31. Almost every Crosby fan ever used to complain about how terrible he was...
Robert Lang 434 Points after 31. Mulletman even made a thread once about Crosby being pretty much exactly twice as good as Robert Lang...
Shane Doan 500 Points after 31. Always solid, never really elite...
Those are all players Crosby is clearly better than. I would be surprised if Crosby doesn't add another 600 Points to his totals from here on out until he retires...
Lol. Without Lemieux the penguins would have been in Quebec City by the time Crosby came around.I'd argue Crosby as the more important Pen.. obviously Lemieux was better, obviously his illness was not his fault, but if you're talking how much a player mattered to his franchise.. the case can be made.
Crosby most likely won't score it in 6 seasons, but he'll likely play anywere between 8-12 seasons after this one. And 8 seasons will be enough even if it includes a half season lockout.Sure but Crosby has had injuries and none of those players were really close to 600 points either so why bring them up?
91 plus points over 6 straight seasons is doable but what about him resigning in a cap era and the team as he ages?
lots of moving parts here.
Oh god no...Mario is one of the top 4 most important hockey players ever in this game's history. Easy. Solid. Not debatable. Gretzky, Howe, Orr, and Lemieux...5th maybe Richard?
Goalies, defencemen and team defence were horrible in the era where Lemieux got most of his points.
You could argue that but you'd lose that argument and I'm not taking anything away from Crosby. Lemieux is the best and most important Penguins player and I doubt that ever changes.I'd argue Crosby as the more important Pen.. obviously Lemieux was better, obviously his illness was not his fault, but if you're talking how much a player mattered to his franchise.. the case can be made.
I sure hope you are talking about Lemieux
Mario? Absolutely
Imagine if CROSBY didn't miss time? LOL Imagine if a bad back and Hodgkin's disease didn't strike smack in the middle of Mario's prime...Imagine if Crosby didn't miss 1.5+ seasons due to concussions...
Would be no doubt he'd pass Mario.
LOL you're done here. None of the three would agree, nor *should* anyone else.Lemieux is nowhere near Gretzky or Howe IMO.
Imagine if CROSBY didn't miss time? LOL Imagine if a bad back and Hodgkin's disease didn't strike smack in the middle of Mario's prime...
LOL you're done here. None of the three would agree, nor *should* anyone else.
Then again, I see enough "Wayne Gretzky isn't the greatest goal scorer ever" to not be surprised anymore......nah, I'm still pretty surprised.
So Bossy broke the 50 in 50 with 39 in 50 in the same era, while also playing for a dynasty?Bossy was better at pure goal scoring than Gretzky.
Lemieux is nowhere near Gretzky or Howe IMO.
I'd argue Crosby as the more important Pen.. obviously Lemieux was better, obviously his illness was not his fault, but if you're talking how much a player mattered to his franchise.. the case can be made.
Imagine if Crosby didn't miss 1.5+ seasons due to concussions...
Would be no doubt he'd pass Mario.
I'd argue Crosby as the more important Pen.. obviously Lemieux was better, obviously his illness was not his fault, but if you're talking how much a player mattered to his franchise.. the case can be made.
Well thats complete BS, but if that were even true it doesnt change that Lemieux was better than everyone else (exception being 99) by lightyears.