Pacioretty, Karlsson and Stone brought back better returns than just the 14th overall pick. I don't know why you're mentioning them, those trades help my case for why Kessel has more value than that.
I'm honestly not sure what you're trying to argue. Pacioretty was traded for Tatar, Suzuki and a 2nd. Suzuki was the #13 pick a year prior. Stone was traded for Brannstrom, Lindberg and a 2nd as a rental. Brannstrom was the #15 pick 2 years prior, but he was also eclipsing on superstar potential. That helps my case for Kessel having more value than just the 14th overall pick, unless the #14th overall pick this year somehow has more value than a guy drafted 14th overall the year before. Those guys support my case that pick #14 alone isn't close enough for Kessel, when he's more likely to bring back something like say Panik, the #14 pick and a 2nd round pick.
Based on what exactly? Hornqvist is the type of player that all coaches and teammates love. And with 4 seasons left at 5.3m, that's far from some "way overpaid, way too long" contract.
As for Jack Johnson, there's a reason why there were multiple teams interested in him last summer. Personally I would have been fine with him going elsewhere, but at 3.25m for 4 more seasons, he too is far from overpaid or having "negative value".
Players don't just have negative value because a Washington fan decides they don't like them. I know you wish it were otherwise, but welcome to reality.
Tocchet is Ann Sullivan to Kessel’s Helen KellerKessel to the Yotes confirmed. Tocchet welcomes his sweet prince home.
You think Jack Johnson has positive value, and question me being in touch with reality?Based on what exactly? Hornqvist is the type of player that all coaches and teammates love. And with 4 seasons left at 5.3m, that's far from some "way overpaid, way too long" contract.
As for Jack Johnson, there's a reason why there were multiple teams interested in him last summer. Personally I would have been fine with him going elsewhere, but at 3.25m for 4 more seasons, he too is far from overpaid or having "negative value".
Players don't just have negative value because a Washington fan decides they don't like them. I know you wish it were otherwise, but welcome to reality.
I feel any Kessel trade would have to happen after Panarin signs. Whoever wants Kessel would probably prefer Panarin for no assets and just cap.
I don't really get those comparisons to be honest.
Pacioretty didn't have any trade protection (Kessel does) and Montreal had to take Tatar back, who at the time was viewed as a cap dump after being benched most of his time in Vegas. Its easy to look at Tatar as a big piece now, but he just had what was easily the best season of his career at 27/28, which is far from the norm.
Stone didn't have any trade protection and was not a rental. The trade only happened because Vegas got to speak with Stone first and were confident they would be able to sign him after they acquired him. Stone is also a much more valuable piece right now than Kessel. He's younger, a selke caliber winger and has much larger overall positive impact on the game.
You think Jack Johnson has positive value, and question me being in touch with reality?
JJ was a healthy scratch, for good reason, he is terrible. Don’t take a Washington fans word for it, try asking Penguin fans.
As for Horny, he is the kind of player that ages quickly. He plays such a physical game, injuries are bound to tear him down. He is more a PP specialist rather than a 5 vs. 5 threat. Maybe he can be moved, but you are taking a contract back.
Schultz just isn't a guy who is worth it to move. He's our 3rd best defenmenan and the 2nd pairing anchor. Also sees time on PP1 when Letang is off his game. I think he's more valuable to us than in a tradeMight have interest in Letang on NYR but not optimistic we agree on price either in value or currency.
Schultz is a more reasonable target, POSSIBLY.
yea? nay?
Report: Only Crosby, Malkin 'untouchable' for Pens on trade marketOnly Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin are considered "untouchable" when it comes to a potential Penguins trade, a team source told The Athletic's Rob Rossi.
i seem to remember more Leafs fans saying Kessel was washed up and garbage. then he won two Cups.Remember when Penguins fans said that Olli Maatta was going to be better than Morgan Rielly? Good times man
that seems like a silly return. i wouldn't do that. not sure why Arizona would either.I think he wants to go to AZ and I feel that the Penguins will probably look to do him right by trading him there — barring the trade packages that are on the table from other teams.
Gogo + 1st for Kessel is a trade I’d do for sure. Obviously there’s a contingency on getting rid of Maatta or JJ if we acquire a LHD, but we can package one of those two aforementioned players with a pick or prospect as necessary.
i seem to remember more Leafs fans saying Kessel was washed up and garbage. then he won two Cups.Remember when Penguins fans said that Olli Maatta was going to be better than Morgan Rielly? Good times man
i seem to remember more Leafs fans saying Kessel was washed up and garbage. then he won two Cups.
ah, good times indeed.
*deja vu*
while we're playing the "not me" game, i never claimed one way or another how good Maatta would be down the road.Not me, I’m the biggest Phil Kessel fan in the city, I have 6 jerseys and my friends call me “Kess”, my hockey number is 81. So no, not me included in that. I always KNEW how good Kessel was putting up a PPG with Bozak as his centre, you guys THOUGHT Maatta was going to be better and y’all couldn’t have been more wrong, it’s hilarious that’s what you guys thought at one point You guys will probably trade Kessel anyway..