What am I talking about? It's not complicated. I find the Sid-hater fanboys to be as amusing (and generally) absurd as the Sid fanboys.What are you talking about? It’s a known fact Crosby has constantly been called the “best” no matter where he ends up or what he does/doesn’t achieve. He gets the benefit of the doubt more than anyone due to his past play.
Crosby was terrible, yet now we are seeing even better accuses like “he could have been a PPG if he got some lucky bounces.” Face it, many here can’t handle Crosby NOT being considered the best and always need validation. Now that it’s swung the opposite way, many can’t help but search for reasons in desperation in order to preserve his “title.”
What else am I talking about? It is absurd to suggest that Sid isn't an excellent player and it is equally absurd to expect him to excel every moment of his career.
Anything else I was talking about? I'll leave discussions about who is, or isn't, the "best" to you, Pierre McGuire, and the others, I'll just watch the game.
Last edited: