That's unreal. Sometimes, I wonder how the likes of Bradman would have fared against the raw pace and crazy spin of today's players. It feels so taboo to say that it is unlikely he'd manage a 99.94.
I feel fairly confident saying he would not be able to keep that kind of average up.
I think it is about as taboo as saying that Gretzky would not have 200 points seasons in todays NHL. Players are just bigger and fitter today. Also, a lot more time and energy put into researching players strengths and weaknesses. Scouting is just not limited to the draft ..
Just look at Bradman's numbers against the teams he played:
vs England: 89.78 (37 Matches)
vs West Indies: 74.5 (5 Matches)
vs India: 178.75 (5 Matches)
vs South Africa: 201.5 (5 matches)
The only 'good' competition back then was England and his average against them was 89.78 (still impressive but 10 runs per game lower than his average). The numbers against India and South Africa help his average substantially. Back then spin was not really that much of an issue and it was more about pace bowling. So not only would he be dealing with faster bowlers, he would also be dealing with a completely different beast in spin bowling.
I don't want to take anything away from Bradman. He was one of the best (if not the best batsmen) to ever play the game. But it was a different time and I think his sample size of 52 Test matches played is too small.