BK
"Goalie Apologist"
/\ Good post but NHL goalies can't afford to be inconsistent and expect to last long in the league.
Good thing I am not or have never been a pro goalie.
/\ Good post but NHL goalies can't afford to be inconsistent and expect to last long in the league.
Good thing I am not or have never been a pro goalie.
I do but anything can happen. I have played lights out and stopped all the high quality chances only to have a shutout or game ruined by a shot that goes off my own player then in or I let in a weak due to technique mistakes or trying to do to much.
Goalies are weird, sometimes the games moves so slow and it comes easy and random times it is moving way to fast and you can’t stop a beachball. I had games in Jrs, AAA, and HS where I could stop everything and make it looks smooth only to play in a beer league/practice the next night/day where I could not stop a single shot.
I do wonder that the threshold his where weak chances out weigh high quality chances. Never have taken the time to dig into the data.
You still play?
Goaltending at the NHL level could be the most difficult position in sports.
Goalie? Not a chance. My back is trashed at this point. I skate during the winter and few times a summer. Goalie has no appeal to me.
I stay up to date on the position though just in case my daughter plays or if I feel like coaching.
Well that sucks. I was hoping to add you to my ever growing goalie sub list.
Get your back fixed.
Well you come in on the weekends for games. A little beer league hockey and a Hawks game sounds like a good weekend!
Well you come in on the weekends for games. A little beer league hockey and a Hawks game sounds like a good weekend!
Haha sounds like fun except for the beer league game.
I was actually looking at gear the other day and had the itch but then my back reminded me that it hates twisting and turning like that.
We need to recognize that even if Crow returns it is rather unlikely that he will return at the same level he was playing before. Now, it is, of course, possible that he does pick up where he left off, but...
He is 33 years old --- many goalies begin a rather sharp drop-off at that age --- and that is w/o mitigating circumstances and w/o missing a great deal of ice time. For Crow, he is not only older and at that natural drop-off age (that most, not all, but most drop off markedly) -- but he has some sort of injury (or something) that he is coming off of --- which lowers the probability of coming back at the same level even more so than for a guy that age w/o such mitigating circumstances. Further, he has not played in a long, long time. That does not help either. So...
Even if Crow does return (which is not by any means guaranteed) there is a pretty good chance that he will no longer be a top 6 or 8 goalie. He might... but it is more likely that he plays at a level beneath what has been his norm --- age, rust, and coming off injury will do that to a guy. So...
I hope he returns and hope he does so without drop-off --- but I am not convinced that it is reasonable to expect that if he does return that we get the same excellence that we are accustomed to. We might, and that would be great, but I would not expect so. Hope for... sure. Expect... no.
Do you have proof of this or is this more of an assumption? Not saying you are wrong I am just looking for clarification plus I would love to dig into their data.
We need to recognize that even if Crow returns it is rather unlikely that he will return at the same level he was playing before. Now, it is, of course, possible that he does pick up where he left off, but...
He is 33 years old --- many goalies begin a rather sharp drop-off at that age --- and that is w/o mitigating circumstances and w/o missing a great deal of ice time. For Crow, he is not only older and at that natural drop-off age (that most, not all, but most drop off markedly) -- but he has some sort of injury (or something) that he is coming off of --- which lowers the probability of coming back at the same level even more so than for a guy that age w/o such mitigating circumstances. Further, he has not played in a long, long time. That does not help either. So...
Even if Crow does return (which is not by any means guaranteed) there is a pretty good chance that he will no longer be a top 6 or 8 goalie. He might... but it is more likely that he plays at a level beneath what has been his norm --- age, rust, and coming off injury will do that to a guy. So...
I hope he returns and hope he does so without drop-off --- but I am not convinced that it is reasonable to expect that if he does return that we get the same excellence that we are accustomed to. We might, and that would be great, but I would not expect so. Hope for... sure. Expect... no.
Do you have proof of this or is this more of an assumption? Not saying you are wrong I am just looking for clarification plus I would love to dig into their data.
Best of luck trying to evaluate goalies at any age. It seems to me they're all different but I do think that the modern style takes its toll on the lower body (much more than it did in previous generations). IMO, generally speaking, a 33 year-old goalie is getting long in the tooth these days.
Crawford wins the vezina this year.
I don't think age is a big concern at this point and age 33 doesn't strike me as some sort of cliff. Since we are just using anecdotal evidence, I'll point out that Fluery was 33 this year and Rinne won the Vezina at 35.