haters
I came in here to see some haters flailing about
You take some of this back and forth too seriously. I think Tippett makes snap judgements on guys and is consistently too stubborn when things don't work (Boedker back on the point, Chip in the top six, overworking netminder). I don't hate Chipchura. He's just an obvious symptom of our coach's and front office's weaknesses. Like "good guy" Moss. Hence the finger pointing.
I think that's the case with most of the chipchura "haters". I do think he gets way too much time, and that is a knock on tip (his strange attachment to random scrubs and how he often plays them above their proper roles), but I, and I hope others, don't really think he's the reason we have and do suck as a team. It's a factor for sure, but nothing as major as our general lack of talent, inconsistent defense and goal tending, and putrid powerplay. What confuses me is when the chip defenders come in and say he's not the reason we're losing. I don't follow the boards nearly as often as last year, but I don't think many, if any, posters actually argue that he is. It's more of a running joke on how he keeps getting more and more chances after being a waste of space.You take some of this back and forth too seriously. I think Tippett makes snap judgements on guys and is consistently too stubborn when things don't work (Boedker back on the point, Chip in the top six, overworking netminder). I don't hate Chipchura. He's just an obvious symptom of our coach's and front office's weaknesses. Like "good guy" Moss. Hence the finger pointing.
I mostly harp on Chipchura bc I love seeing the board's apologists spring into action.
Tipchura played his role last night. My issue is when Chippett puts him in situations he's not suited for, which is way too often.
The article may not be wrong but it's very, very weak. No compelling cases made without glaring counterpoints. At least he acknowledged them but did NOTHING in the way of discrediting them.
When I was a beat reporter for the team
When I was a beat reporter for the team there is one player in particular that actually flourished under Dave Tippett and that's David Schlemko.
When he first came up with the team he was a defensive liability in his own end and in transition. I remember one game in particular on the road (if memory serves) against the Penguins where he allowed a goal that was so bad he was sent down to the minors after that.
After some time he came back to the club a different player and stayed with the club ever since (during his time on the Coyotes).
Tippett gives players more than enough chances to succeed before making a move. Wojtek Wolksi is a prime example of a player given more than enough chances to succeed with the club before being traded (got a great story about that).
Point is that Tippett is a great assessor of talent and if someone is being sent down or needs to spend a year down in the AHL or gets traded, there's a reason for it.
I agree with you in that Tip, as well as DM, are excellent at evaluating talent, and also know how to bring along young guys appropriately.
Turris is the only young player that left Arizona and thrived else where. Now he wanted out, had a contract dispute, we got a good return for him, so there were plenty of circumstances. Other young players have developed well under Tip like OEL/Hanzal/Reider. Some would say Bods was rushed by TGO and has been stifled by Tip's system. But, Bods is a solid all around player. We might find out next year if he breaks out with another club/another system as a UFA, but I doubt he does much better some place else. Runblad/Gormley look like busts, but to be fair, it is still a little early to say that for sure.
How come you aren't anymore?
They got revoked about four or so years ago for a reason that still has yet to be explained to me. I switched to regular NHL and am happier now.
A little off topic, but I'm glad to see you back. I always kind of felt bad for you. You were bold, and wrote articles on sometimes touchy subjects or controversial items, and due to stubborn people who hated other people's opinions that didn't agree with theirs, i remember some of our posters would **** on you and criticize you for the dumbest reasons. Just because they didn't like what you had to say about a subject they were sensitive to, they would nitpick and harp on you for stupid **** like grammar or punctuation. The epitome of butt hurt, stubborn forum fans.
I just want to say i always enjoy you articles and admire your boldness. I think you're a great writer and I'm happy you found a new gig. Hope to see more your pieces on our forum in the future and i appreciate your hard work. We need you to be doing the in-person interviews. Someone who's not afraid to ask the uncomfortable question that everyone wants answered
Keep doin your thing Dole, again i appreciate it.
Agreed. I usually like Craig's stuff, but this is a fluff piece.
I notice that Craig didn't write anything to "dispel the myth" that Tippett shows favoritism towards his guys, who are usually broken-down journeyman players, for some inexplicable reason.
A good example of this is Tippett personally reaching out to Maloney after FA last year to try and get Moss back on the roster, and proceeding to calling him a "solid NHL player", who "doesn't make a lot of mistakes", and who's "greatest value comes at protecting leads", last February when Moss had yet to score a goal up until that point.
I'm also not quick to forget the Andrew Campbell experience, or Chipchura being played as a top-6 center for several stretches of time, going on three consecutive seasons now.
I may not know what a beat writer is but I thought you were what is considered a "blogger". Though if nothing is ever actually printed anymore, what's the difference?
The only reason Moss wasn't back this year was bring boyd Gordon back. Moss was a very solid defensive forward. I would've welcomed him back with open arms. I was petitioning for them to re-sign him last year. for what he was paid he did his job well.
Andrew Campbell came in and did an amicable job on the back end. wasn't flashy but was solid. as for chip there was a lot of times last year when he was by far the best player on the ice so yeah he deserved a top 6 spot.
The only reason Moss wasn't back this year was bring boyd Gordon back. Moss was a very solid defensive forward. I would've welcomed him back with open arms. I was petitioning for them to re-sign him last year. for what he was paid he did his job well.
Andrew Campbell came in and did an amicable job on the back end. wasn't flashy but was solid. as for chip there was a lot of times last year when he was by far the best player on the ice so yeah he deserved a top 6 spot.