TheOtherOne
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2010
- 8,272
- 5,266
I'm confused what you think the point of posting this is.
Most of these are trash sources that you shouldn't go to for news.
A few are old articles based on outdated knowledge "WaPo: ...for now"
A couple are perfectly legitimate, factual headlines that don't undermine whatever you think they are undermining.
AP: "isn't exactly more deadly than the flu" Headline makes it clear that this is nuanced, I'm sure the article itself explains what numbers they're using and why it's conditionally true.
Reuters: "Chinese study says" They're reporting on what a Chinese study says. They make no claim about whether it's true. It's clear that it's a Chinese study and nothing more.
Frankly nobody should give two shits about what Wired or Changing America have to say about the pandemic.
You do quite effectively illustrate why media literacy needs to be taught to all Americans.