certainly matters for the guy that pays the billsWho care's really...its not like we are a cap team anyways. What does it matter what we save at this point?
certainly matters for the guy that pays the billsWho care's really...its not like we are a cap team anyways. What does it matter what we save at this point?
Exactly. Let him play down there for 3-4 games to get his confidence/game back. Then he will return.Probably just assigned to the AHL once he clears to get some games in, McKenna can back up until Condon is playing with enough confidence to return
Can't make this stuff up.
We go from paying a team to take Hammond from us because he costs 1 million over the next year, and now will have Condon in the AHL (if they send him) the year after signing him to a very obvious bad deal.
Dorion's tenure has been entertaining at the very least
lots of players go through rough spotsIt is unique when the players you are waiving are supposed to be the key personnel you signed for long contracts.
Dorion...
Waives Smith right before season starts => puts him back on the top line.
Goalie has an embarrassing game => waives him immediately.
The guy has zero concept of how to handle team psychology. No wonder his room was a cluster**** last season. It will get only worse going forward.
Meh, its a bad contract but hardly crippling...
It's insane how obvious this is, and how management seem to never follow along.For a normal team, this contract would not be crippling.
With a budget team, every mistake is magnified because of how much of an effect it has.
Every team has their Condon and Burrows type contracts. There are even a handful of teams with Ryan type contracts. For most of those teams,.they aren't as big of a deal as here where a few bad contracts can mess up our roster flexibility
I think the people who say we should not pay non-stars due to the risk of bad contracts might be on to something. But if that's our approach, it means guys like Dzingel, Pageau, Tierney, etc shouldn't be retained either long term.
It is unique when the players you are waiving are supposed to be the key personnel you signed for long contracts.
This is so much the issue,TY DP....Us having to take a huge monster deal with Phaneuf to rid ourselves of dead money,when we could have just let it ride in the AHL or in the pressbox...But money in for money out ...For a normal team, this contract would not be crippling.
With a budget team, every mistake is magnified because of how much of an effect it has.
Every team has their Condon and Burrows type contracts. There are even a handful of teams with Ryan type contracts. For most of those teams,.they aren't as big of a deal as here where a few bad contracts can mess up our roster flexibility
I think the people who say we should not pay non-stars due to the risk of bad contracts might be on to something. But if that's our approach, it means guys like Dzingel, Pageau, Tierney, etc shouldn't be retained either long term.
0 chance.Does anybody think he will get claimed? I can’t see it
Only for the wrong players though lolGetting confidence back implies that you were good before.
He was never good to begin with, he caught a lightning in a bottle once, and even then he was posting average goalie #s. So of course we continue to reward short term success with long term commitment without ever thinking about the future.
Any chance Mckenna is called up, if Condon clears, have never seen him play.
2.5 M vs 700kSeems like the obvious move, even though McKenna probably isn't any better than Condon (granted, at least his confidence isn't completely shot).
Should be interesting to hear if the team is sniffing around goalies outside the organization. Unfortunately it doesn't sound like it, as they're making this sound more like a conditioning stint.
There is no chance we will be burying a guy with ~5 million dollars left on his contract in the AHL. We couldn't even finish 1 season with Hammond and had to give up a 3rd to get rid of him.Seems like the obvious move, even though McKenna probably isn't any better than Condon (granted, at least his confidence isn't completely shot).
Should be interesting to hear if the team is sniffing around goalies outside the organization. Unfortunately it doesn't sound like it, as they're making this sound more like a conditioning stint.
Only for the wrong players though lol
Pretty much.If you have proven that you have been consistently good for many years you get shipped out ie Turris, Karlsson, Alfie, Spezza etc.
If you have a decent couple of months or a year overachieving, you get rewarded a multi year contract ie Greening, Smith, Condon etc.
There is no chance we will be burying a guy with ~5 million dollars left on his contract in the AHL. We couldn't even finish 1 season with Hammond and had to give up a 3rd to get rid of him.
Agreed, have we ever had 1 way money in the minors under a Eugene Melnyk owned team? Thought it was part of the mission statement to be honest.