Ogopogo said:
One of the fundamental changes I made was to eliminate the post season all-star selections. These gave players like John LeClair (LW) a distinct advantage over players like Steve Yzerman (C). Rather than using post-season all stars, I am now using the top 7 finishers in the Hart Trophy voting - not just the winner and runner up. I think this gives a more accurate view of who the greats really are.
As far as playoffs go, the only information I am currently using is the Conn Smythe trophy. I have compiled my list of greatest playoff scorers but, that still hurts players who were stuck on bad teams for their entire career (i.e. Marcel Dionne). So, to this point, I have not incorporated playoff performance other than Conn Smythe awards.
A very smart move with eliminating the post-season all-stars. The discrepency between centre and the other two positions is glaring. IMO, there are nine centres who belong in the top 25-30 all-time: Gretzky, Lemieux, Beliveau, Esposito, Trottier, Clarke, Mikita, Morenz and Messier. There are only three LWs who are veritable top-50 all-time players - Hull, Lindsay and Mahovalich. Others deserve consideration (Johnny Bucyk, for example), but only three would be consensus. (I think the THN top 50 had roughly a dozen Cs before the No. 3 LW, Mahovalic, who came in around 36 or 37.
I wouldn't rank Dionne in the top 25. Yes, he had some great seasons, and was on some dog teams in his career, but he rarely, if ever, elevated his play in the post-season. It's a very big strike against him when discussing the all-time greats, and a big reason why he hovered around 40th in the THN top 50.
Playoffs count, big-time, and while Dionne can't be faulted for his lack of playoff series wins, since he was never on a top team, you can fault him for consistently not raising his play to another level. (Something almost all of the all-time greats, from Gretzky to Esposito, were able to do).