Comcast's power play?

Discussion in 'Fugu's Business of Hockey Forum' started by Tra La La, Jul 20, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. Tra La La

    Tra La La Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    4,707
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Buffalo, New York
    http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/12174949.htm

     
  2. JeffW

    JeffW Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The only reson I would prefer ESPN to the others is that ESPN can offer HD broadcasts. As far as I know this is not an option with the other networks who are negotiating for the broadcast rights (Comcast, Turner, Spike)
     
  3. Rails

    Rails Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,333
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    LBurg and FBurg, VA
    Home Page:
    If it came down to more coverage (and more games hopefully) and a better attitude towards the sport or HD broadcasts...which would you choose?
     
  4. Phil333

    Phil333 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Messages:
    997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New York City
    ESPN is channel 28 for me. Spike 36. TNT 3. Do you even know what channel OLN is? I don't. I would never surf up to wherever it is and be like, "oh yeah, there is a game on." OLN is a joke. I really hope they do not get it. And let's not forget that it is in almost 40% fewer households than Spike.
     
  5. PhoPhan

    PhoPhan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    14,726
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    176
    The local Comcast affiliate (Comcast Sportsnet Philadelphia) broadcasts most of the Flyers' games, and all of them are available in HD. I'd assume if Comcast picked up the NHL as a whole, they'd do it as well.
     
  6. i am dave

    i am dave Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,182
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Corner of 1st & 1st
    I know. It's Channel 99 on my system.
    :D
     
  7. TonySCV

    TonySCV Golden

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    14,425
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    HD broadcasts, without a doubt.

    - T
     
  8. GKJ

    GKJ Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    140,785
    Likes Received:
    2,583
    Trophy Points:
    232
    ESPN is 44 for me. The Deuce is 47. Spike 34. OLN 96 I usually surf between 29 (The Weather Channel) and 47 (ESPN2)
     
  9. All-Star

    All-Star Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Snake Mountain
    Home Page:
    It's in the 400s on mine, along with TSN, Sportsnet, The Score, NHL Network,...

    Doesn't tv in the US group its sports channels together?
     
  10. GKJ

    GKJ Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    140,785
    Likes Received:
    2,583
    Trophy Points:
    232

    No. Only premium channels.


    I have digital cable, when they added ESPNews it was 102.


    We have NFL network on 180 and 275 as well...same network, 2 different channels.
     
  11. All-Star

    All-Star Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Snake Mountain
    Home Page:
    Wow... Memorizing channels must be a real pain in the ass.
     
  12. Phil333

    Phil333 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Messages:
    997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New York City
    Yup. Channels here are spread out. I know 1 through 40 or 50 and I know where the other ones that I scan are (ESPNClassic, TVLand, HBO) but besides those, I do not know what channel OLN is or anything up in the numbers.
     
  13. Yus

    Yus Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    TNT is in HD. Comcast could get games on INHD.
     
  14. GSC2k2*

    GSC2k2* Guest

    I am curious. Exactly how many of you own High Def televisions?
     
  15. i am dave

    i am dave Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,182
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Corner of 1st & 1st
    Not I. But ask me again after my Christmas bonus this year...
     
  16. Sanman19

    Sanman19 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Jersey
    I don't whats the prices on those?
     
  17. GSC2k2*

    GSC2k2* Guest

    Quite a chunk of cash, generally. That is why I am asking. I would like to know how many of these people trumpeting a NEED for HD in the next NHL TV deal actually have the capability to enjoy it.

    And it is not digital cable, for those who don't know the difference (not directing that to any poster - just in general). Digital cable and HD are completely different things.
     
  18. Yus

    Yus Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You can get a 30" CRT HDTV for about $700-900. You can actually get smaller (and therefore cheaper), but I really wouldn't recomend anything smaller than 30" for CRT.

    I actually picked up a Sanyo HT30744 for $550 when Walmart was clearing them out. :D
     
  19. John Flyers Fan

    John Flyers Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,416
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Two for me, and it does make a tremendous difference, not only in the picture quality, but the sound is drastically improved as well.
     
  20. Thibaj

    Thibaj Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    335
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Montreal
    Home Page:
    I have digital cable in Montreal and the sports channel are all over the place, RDS 33, RIS 99, TSN 60, Sportsnet 81 to 84, The Score 111, but you can always program your remote and put all your sports stations as your "favorite" stations.
     
  21. Marshall

    Marshall Hi beat writers!

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2002
    Messages:
    12,818
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    187
    Home Page:
    I own an HDTV, though I've only had the chance to watch one hockey game on it. It really made a difference.

    Comcast's regional station in Washington, D.C. broadcasts in HD.
     
  22. RLC

    RLC Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    622
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Retired VP-Telco
    Location:
    Montreal
    So let talk abot the NHL and HDTV.

    The technology has been available you years. it took US legislation to put a fire under the broabcasters butts. To them it's all a big expence with little return. Even now with limited HDTV stations those same station don't have all the shows or sports events in HD, it's all about "delay,delay,delay". The pressure is mounting for things to change, sure eveyone is stateing they have plans for the future, that's good PR but wanting to wait untill almost everyone has a HDTV and cable and all other industries have converted before you actually go out and buy the darn HD camers to actually produce the shows should NOT BE THE LAST STEP.

    with the re-start of the NHL and what I am sure will be a media blitz after that, not to sign a tv deal that demands 16:9 HD hockey
    would be a real missed opportunity to promote the NHL. It has been known for years that Hockey with it's rink being rectangular aspect and the fact the the puck is so small will benifit MOST above all the other sports with 16:9 HD picture quality. Although it's true that only 5-10% of people have a HD set, HD set remains the highest growth market currently, If you want the NHL to explode with growth you must sell the very best product you can and that includes 16:9 HDTV, mark my words not just a 4:3 picture broadcast over a HDTV station with black bars all over the picture just for PR.
     
  23. Dr Love

    Dr Love Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2002
    Messages:
    20,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Gunslinger
    Location:
    Location, Location!
    That's incorrect. The legislation was for digital broadcast, not HD.
     
  24. RLC

    RLC Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    622
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Retired VP-Telco
    Location:
    Montreal
    HD IS digital, it can only be called a sub group under the digital broadcast legislation. HD is not yet another type of techlonlgy useing something else but digital broadcasting. My point is and contunues to be the expenditure for new hd digital cameras and stopping the use of analogue cameras then converting that picture into a digital format . This is NOT the selling point for HDTV or even digital picture broadcasting. Digital is trumpeted as better picture quality and the use of any analogue camera in the production of any kind of show is continued resistance to this legislation. just who ( which lobby group) is to blame for the ultra slow transition?
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2005
  25. Dr Love

    Dr Love Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2002
    Messages:
    20,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Gunslinger
    Location:
    Location, Location!
    HD is digital, but digital is not HD. There is no FCC mandate for HD broadcast, only digital broadcast. Your other point I don't disagree with.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"