I struggle with Orr. I just don’t know how to slot or compare him at all. I agree with 66 and 99 being 1/2. I would argue that outside of MJ, no other players dominated a sport like those two did.
I think he's so vastly underrated. 
You have him higher/lower? Lidstrom is also in my top 10.
Jagr would honestly be my #3 if he could have led a team to a championship himself. Especially during those Mario-less years. Probably an unfair opinion of mine.
Jagr is like Marino in football. He was so good, but really didn’t win much of anything. Sure, he got two cups in his first two years, but never when he was the man. I think that matters.
it's not at all like shoplifting. It's like Hunts making Ketchup even though Heinz already did it. Or the 2nd potato chip company to add BBQ because they realized that people liked it.Who made something first is different from violating other's intellectual property. It's should be held sacred because it also protects small companies from the big ones.
That's like someone rationalizing shoplifting steaks from Walmart because they don't like the company.
I've derailed enough with my nonsense.
Totally agree on this. Brodeur had the best career, Hasek had the dominant run, but put a gun to my head and make me choose, I take Roy.
Yeah, I don’t think these comparisons can be based on skill. Today’s players would be so dominant. To me it is how dominant they were in their own era and how far did they transcend the game and record books. Winning is also a huge piece.
Pearson has been better than Hags has been for like a year. He's had two good games in a row too.
