https://www.lighthousehockey.com/2013/6/7/4404684/nhl-cba-college-loophole-ncaa-changethe CBA ensures that if a prospect legitimately wants to leave college in his third college year (if he did a post-draft USHL year, thus making his third college year his "fourth" June 1) -- or even in his fourth year if he quits college before January 1 -- to start his career, he can still do so and, if not signed by his drafting club by June 1, he is free to shop his services.
However, a prospect who is completing all his credits (or very nearly) as a senior in college (so, he stayed enrolled past Jan. 1 his fourth year, probably because he wanted to finish his hockey season first), cannot then use the loophole to "leave college" early and become a free agent on June 1. Such a player's rights would be held through Aug. 15.
So if you decide college isn't your thing anymore, the NHL says you still belong to your drafting team -- unless you've put in three years (for USHL or junior B-type players) or four years (for traditional college-bound draftees) without your drafting team coaxing you out of college already. I've always read that minor "loophole" as some sort of recognition for the fact that a prospect in his fourth June 1 since his draft has already given up some earning potential by pursuing his degree through age 21-23 instead of taking an ELC at age 18-20.
I've explained this multiple times, he has to physically leave school for that. If he plays his senior year, his rights are still ours. You've added nothing.You don't have his rights for five years. Since he's playing a year of juniors after being drafted, he can choose to be a FA after his junior year of college if he wants on June 1. See Blake Wheeler, Jimmy Vesey, and Justin Schultz.
The downside with him going back to the USHL is we'll lose his rights before he graduates college. So gotta hope he's ready after 3 years in the NCAA.
he will also be wearing the number 99 and i see no reason why he could not.
A little early in the day to be wasted IMO.I once heard or read that Erik Johnson was the best player available. That turned out to be false, the best player available that year may have been Phil Kessell or Toews. Bottom line is that too much emphasis is placed on Central Scouting and a kids hair do and less time spent actually doing the investigative research needed to find great players that might not get the attention others get.
Well he was drafted in the 3rd round. Coincidence? I think not.May as well start hyping him now. Letang's replacement.
So was Murray and GuentzelWell he was drafted in the 3rd round. Coincidence? I think not.
Well he was drafted in the 3rd round. Coincidence? I think not.