48 points in 44 games.
In team who is last in NHL Eastern Conference.
It's unbelievable. He and Stone (48 in 45) are really great ****ing players. And I really want Stone in Philly too.
I might even want Stone more than Panarin. I think he will cost substantially less while providing incredible value because of how good he is defensively as well. He could be our Hossa.
I'm greedy. I want both.I might even want Stone more than Panarin. I think he will cost substantially less while providing incredible value because of how good he is defensively as well. He could be our Hossa.
He has 36 ES points in 44 games. Last year in his 1st 44 games, he had 33.
So more points on a much worse team.
Difference is PP...11 points this year and 21 at same point last year.
Crazy that it's our PP keeping guys points down.
I'm greedy. I want both.
Panarin-Giroux-Stone as our top line would be pretty amazing.
He has 36 ES points in 44 games. Last year in his 1st 44 games, he had 33.
So more points on a much worse team.
Difference is PP...11 points this year and 21 at same point last year.
Crazy that it's our PP keeping guys points down.
I'm not, I'll take Stone, and save the money for a veteran RHD.
G - Couts - Stone on the 1st line, Lindblom - Patrick - TK, and JVR - Frost - Kakko on the 3rd. Who needs a 4th?
Then replace JVR with Farabee in a year.
It's amusing that you have Patrick (11 points) penciled in as your 2C while Voracek (35 points) doesn't even make your roster.
That doesn't look like a much better team than what we have now. Frost and Kakko are question marks at best. If we get rid of Simmonds and Voracek we need more than just Stone as replacement.I'm not, I'll take Stone, and save the money for a veteran RHD.
G - Couts - Stone on the 1st line, Lindblom - Patrick - TK, and JVR - Frost - Kakko on the 3rd. Who needs a 4th?
Then replace JVR with Farabee in a year.
It's amusing that you have Patrick (11 points) penciled in as your 2C while Voracek (35 points) doesn't even make your roster.
That doesn't look like a much better team than what we have now. Frost and Kakko are question marks at best. If we get rid of Simmonds and Voracek we need more than just Stone as replacement.
Frost and Kakko aren't even in the NHL right now. Kakko hasn't even been drafted yet (and probably won't ever be a Flyer anyway).Stone is a better player than Voracek, so you don't think Frost and Kakko make up for Simmonds' 4th line production at 5v5?
It's why I want to add the higher end guys this summer to take the BURDEN off of guys like Patrick and Lindblom to produce as 2nd liners, or it sinks us.Patrick is all of 20, and has been jacked around this season.
Couts in his second season 46g 4-11 15
Giroux at 22 had 26 ES points in his second season.
A little early to write off Patrick's scoring potential.
So if Patrick plays defense, by your measure, 300% more often than Jake, that still doesn't equal the fact that Jake has 318% more offense.
Patrick has a long ways to go to be Voracek's level of offense and it's really likely he will never get there. Jake can certainly have better seasons.
I'd take Frost at even money to as outscore Patrick in the NHL next year and I don't even know if he'll start the year on the team.
Anyway, I still think Jake can be worthy of a top 9 spot next year.
By this logic Jack Hughes wouldn't be an upgrade next year either because he's not even in the NHL right now.Frost and Kakko aren't even in the NHL right now. Kakko hasn't even been drafted yet (and probably won't ever be a Flyer anyway).
If we replace Voracek and Simmonds I'd rather want proven NHL talent.
We also thought replacing Filppula with Patrick would instantly make us a much better team and it hasn't really made a huge difference yet.
Actually, this is as good as it gets for Voracek offensively, on a 56 ES point pace, he could have more PP points, but that's another issue.
However, he's also -17, and a lot of that is deserved.
His xGF is 49.27, xGFrel -3.14
Patrick, xGF 52.48, xGFrel +1.17