ahmedou
DOU
- Oct 7, 2017
- 19,244
- 18,632
Owns an ideal frame (6-3, 204 pounds) and plenty of puck-moving acumen. Is sound defensively and can provide a fair amount of offense at lower levels. |
Flaws: Needs to prove he can handle National Hockey League power forwards in the big league. Must also prove he can produce more offense in the NHL. |
Career Potential: Big, solid defenseman. |
A depth move for a playoff run.
How is it a depth move if we traded away another depth D in Schlemko?
RHD. He's 28 years old, 6'3, 204 lbs. Swede.
Forecaster:
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Owns an ideal frame (6-3, 204 pounds) and plenty of puck-moving acumen. Is sound defensively and can provide a fair amount of offense at lower levels. Flaws: Needs to prove he can handle National Hockey League power forwards in the big league. Must also prove he can produce more offense in the NHL. Career Potential: Big, solid defenseman.
Schlemko had ceased being an option so he no longer was depth. Frolin is a healthier body.
...
Now, Christian Folin…. good shot, good size, and when he decides to do so, can be pretty physical. He has experience working within a structured defensive style (which did NOT exist in Philly, but did in LA and Minnesota where he was previously), so I think he may help the Habs as a 3rd pair or extra defenseman...and even though he will be a UFA, his salary is minimal, and I don't think the Habs are looking past this year with him. Only the fact they have a chance to get into the playoffs THIS year, and he might be able to help.
...
If I'm not mistaken he's a stay-at-home type dman who can be an alright number 6, if he's protected and played as such.
Was he playing with the Flyers? Or down in the A ?
Some words of encouragement from a poster in the Rumors thread:
Because simply being a body does not make you a depth player. Schlemko was horrible in his stint with the Habs...time to replaceHow is it a depth move if we traded away another depth D in Schlemko?
I really don't enjoy Benn as he doesn't fit in with our team at all , perhaps Folin will be a better fit next to Kulak.
I really don't enjoy Benn as he doesn't fit in with our team at all , perhaps Folin will be a better fit next to Kulak.
Agree, Benn has been pretty solid lately, nothing to say against the guy...I honestly think Benn's been great at 3RD. But I do think Frolin is a good addition.
No disrespect intended but you don’t sound very knowledgeable with this post.
Why? Because I have an opinion that differs from your own? I have watched every game this year and the year prior and it goes on that way since the early 90s. Benn was fine at times this year but I don't find he fits in well with our style of play , he fumbles with the puck often and always seems to hesitate behind the net. I didn't say that Folin will replace him (or be more effective) but I would give him a try that's for sure. Acting like Benn is the ultimate solution for our bottom pairing sounds quite naive to me.