- Oct 10, 2007
- 22,559
- 10,542
In his short time in the line up, he just couldn't keep up with the speed of the NHL.What happened with Borgstrom? Just didn't develop?
In his short time in the line up, he just couldn't keep up with the speed of the NHL.What happened with Borgstrom? Just didn't develop?
I think he's got a decent upside to him still. But he's from the same mold as Teuvo Teravainen, so not a big favourite of coach Q either. Plus we have Lundell who is a much more promising center prospect at this time.tf happened to Borgstrom? wasnt he a top 25 prospect for a bit?
Leveraging cap space for young pieces is exactly what a rebuilding team should do.
That said, the Blackhawks pro-scouting has been abysmal for years, so I have zero trust they're targeting the correct young players and not just whichever kid some #goodhockeyman promised would be the next big thing over beers.
that's basically what I was alluding to, with bowman trying to load up on a rebuild/retool/youth movement, whatever you want to call it, even if the prospects are projects, chicago needs to start clearing contract spots especially guys who have no future in the org, even if it includes RFAsBoth expiring contracts, so more of a throw in stay under the maximum 50 contracts.
well hopefully the big housecleaning in the scouting department last year establishes themselves in trades like this as a legitimate source of strength moving forward.Leveraging cap space for young pieces is exactly what a rebuilding team should do.
That said, the Blackhawks pro-scouting has been abysmal for years, so I have zero trust they're targeting the correct young players and not just whichever kid some #goodhockeyman promised would be the next big thing over beers.
Thought Wallmark was still with Florida. But this trade gives me the impression that Florida is going to make a big trade for the deadline.
But I wonder if Chicago will use Connolly as leverage for the Seattle expansion draft. Other than that, Stillman can prove himself in Chicago with Keith heading to his final years as I do understand he was solid in junior.
cap space for catsit seems like a lot of effort went into this trade, but I don't really understand the point either GM was trying to achieve and what motivated them other than being bored.
i remember when Borgstrom was an untouchable, time flies huh
I'm interested to hear bowman's take on why he did this. it didn't really set the Hawks back any, but there also seemed very little upside to feel compelled to make this move. maybe this way he can say he did something with all that cap space via trade