Player Discussion Charlie McAvoy IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Emerz

#1 PLD Fanboy
Jun 5, 2013
10,115
9,244
Nova Scotia
I have to agree. I doubt that he would have been as quick to drop his gloves with a bigger, tougher player than Panarin. I'm still surprised at how well Panarin did more than holding his own against a guy outweighing him by 50 lbs. Looks like Panarins boxing lessons paid off.

I'd also like to see Mcavoy play a little cleaner. I'd also like to see him fight within his own weight class next time as well.

McAvoy has been challenged to 2 fights in his career, one against 6'3 210 Dubois and the other against Panarin, I literally cannot recall a single instance of McAvoy turning down someone who wanted to fight him. He doesn't even initiate fights himself, he just plays the game and answers the bell when someone wants to fight him.

I guess I just don't even slightly see what you're seeing, but if you could give me an example or two of McAvoy refusing to fight a bigger man that may help others see your view.
 

Smitty93

Registered User
Dec 6, 2012
8,197
9,364
Yes he is? He's an RFA.

I don't have the exact language, but a player needs three accrued seasons in order to be eligible to sign an offer sheet. An accrued season requires 40 games played. Since McAvoy did not play 40 games his first year, he does not get that accrued season and is not eligible to sign an offer sheet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KnightofBoston

CharasLazyWrister

Registered User
Sep 8, 2008
24,398
21,079
Northborough, MA
I don't have the exact language, but a player needs three accrued seasons in order to be eligible to sign an offer sheet. An accrued season requires 40 games played. Since McAvoy did not play 40 games his first year, he does not get that accrued season and is not eligible to sign an offer sheet.

This is a part of today’s game in which I really need to better educate myself.

If he is not eligible to be offer sheeted, is there any leverage at all on his side? He would have absolutely no other option but to sit out the season if the Bruins and him could not agree on a contract and no chance of another team being able to acquire him without a trade, right? I get the chance of an offer sheet on him is low, regardless of circumstance, but there has to be something I am missing.
 

Mr. Make-Believe

The happy genius of my household
I don't have the exact language, but a player needs three accrued seasons in order to be eligible to sign an offer sheet. An accrued season requires 40 games played. Since McAvoy did not play 40 games his first year, he does not get that accrued season and is not eligible to sign an offer sheet.
Pretty sure all you need to be is an RFA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salem13

Salem13

Registered User
Feb 6, 2008
5,624
1,507
Salem,Mass
Pretty sure all you need to be is an RFA.


I just did my best google-fu and the only reference I found stated ten games, which he had 4 in the P and 6 up here to burn it quite precisely.

If he did not meet the requirements I see no special group of RFA he would fit in that case, he would simply be available for another ELC which we would need to pay 105%
 

13Hockey

Go Bruins
Jul 20, 2006
25,011
20,785
Boston
Yes he is? He's an RFA.

The only possible issue with burning the first year of McAvoy’s ELC is that his restricted free agency clock is moved up a year. But even if McAvoy does become an RFA after the 2018-19 season, he will have fewer than three years of accrued experience due to the 40-game rule. The current CBA states that no other team would be able to sign McAvoy to an offer sheet due to having less than three full seasons under his belt. Essentially, when McAvoy becomes an RFA, he will either need to sign the Bruins’ qualifying offer or sit out until he agrees to a long-term deal.

Why Burning Year One Of Charlie McAvoy’s Contract Isn’t A Big Deal
 

Smitty93

Registered User
Dec 6, 2012
8,197
9,364
Pretty sure all you need to be is an RFA.

Doing a quick Google search, I found this.

The only possible issue with burning the first year of McAvoy’s ELC is that his restricted free agency clock is moved up a year. But even if McAvoy does become an RFA after the 2018-19 season, he will have fewer than three years of accrued experience due to the 40-game rule. The current CBA states that no other team would be able to sign McAvoy to an offer sheet due to having less than three full seasons under his belt. Essentially, when McAvoy becomes an RFA, he will either need to sign the Bruins’ qualifying offer or sit out until he agrees to a long-term deal.

I've seen/heard it said elsewhere as well, but I don't have the language from the CBA to confirm it myself.
 

Smitty93

Registered User
Dec 6, 2012
8,197
9,364
The only possible issue with burning the first year of McAvoy’s ELC is that his restricted free agency clock is moved up a year. But even if McAvoy does become an RFA after the 2018-19 season, he will have fewer than three years of accrued experience due to the 40-game rule. The current CBA states that no other team would be able to sign McAvoy to an offer sheet due to having less than three full seasons under his belt. Essentially, when McAvoy becomes an RFA, he will either need to sign the Bruins’ qualifying offer or sit out until he agrees to a long-term deal.

Why Burning Year One Of Charlie McAvoy’s Contract Isn’t A Big Deal

Jinx
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13Hockey

BruinsFanSince94

The Perfect Fan ™
Sep 28, 2017
32,709
43,379
New England
The only possible issue with burning the first year of McAvoy’s ELC is that his restricted free agency clock is moved up a year. But even if McAvoy does become an RFA after the 2018-19 season, he will have fewer than three years of accrued experience due to the 40-game rule. The current CBA states that no other team would be able to sign McAvoy to an offer sheet due to having less than three full seasons under his belt. Essentially, when McAvoy becomes an RFA, he will either need to sign the Bruins’ qualifying offer or sit out until he agrees to a long-term deal.

Why Burning Year One Of Charlie McAvoy’s Contract Isn’t A Big Deal

Thanks for this. Reason #93937849494744785 why I couldn't be an NHL GM.
 

13Hockey

Go Bruins
Jul 20, 2006
25,011
20,785
Boston
Thanks for this. Reason #93937849494744785 why I couldn't be an NHL GM.

Big reason why I have a lot of optimism where gonna get a great deal on McAvoy is because I found out about this loophole ...He is in a tough position...and holding out never usually benefits a player he pretty much has to take what the bruins give
 

BruinsFanSince94

The Perfect Fan ™
Sep 28, 2017
32,709
43,379
New England
Big reason why I have a lot of optimism where gonna get a great deal on McAvoy is because I found out about this loophole ...He is a tough position...and holding out never usually benefits a player he pretty much has to take what the bruins give

Bruins would be wise to come in with a fair and strong offer.
 

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,225
7,764
Maine
The only possible issue with burning the first year of McAvoy’s ELC is that his restricted free agency clock is moved up a year. But even if McAvoy does become an RFA after the 2018-19 season, he will have fewer than three years of accrued experience due to the 40-game rule. The current CBA states that no other team would be able to sign McAvoy to an offer sheet due to having less than three full seasons under his belt. Essentially, when McAvoy becomes an RFA, he will either need to sign the Bruins’ qualifying offer or sit out until he agrees to a long-term deal.

Why Burning Year One Of Charlie McAvoy’s Contract Isn’t A Big Deal
The CBA is more complicated than US tax code.
 

13Hockey

Go Bruins
Jul 20, 2006
25,011
20,785
Boston
Bruins would be wise to come in with a fair and strong offer.

Agreed which should be in the 4.5-6 million range over 4-6 years which is what other comparable top RFA D have gotten on there 2nd contract with the only exception being Ekland who got 7.5 per

I’d say 4-5 years between 5-6 million is very fair
 

BAD BOY

Registered User
Mar 24, 2018
11,722
8,989
Peabody, Mass
Bruins would be wise to come in with a fair and strong offer.

I offer 35 M over 5. If that got rejected. I offer 41 M over 5 . That’s a tick over 8. With Chara at his age and if Sweeney moves Krug, they will have the cap space, they can build around McAvoy and Vak I forgot his name but is their best prospect. If McAvoy holds out , he holds out. He’s going nowhere. We dumped Seguin for nothing. Hamilton was a as.h..e. I think the first offer is fair and I know the second offer is good. They are not and better not trade him. He’s the future. I don’t care about draft picks or 18\19 year old prospects we will have no patience on developing. Good and YOUNG Defence man don’t grow on trees.
 

BruinsFanSince94

The Perfect Fan ™
Sep 28, 2017
32,709
43,379
New England
I offer 35 M over 5. If that got rejected. I offer 41 M over 5 . That’s a tick over 8. With Chara at his age and if Sweeney moves Krug, they will have the cap space, they can build around McAvoy and Vak I forgot his name but is their best prospect. If McAvoy holds out , he holds out. He’s going nowhere. We dumped Seguin for nothing. Hamilton was a as.h..e. I think the first offer is fair and I know the second offer is good. They are not and better not trade him. He’s the future. I don’t care about draft picks or 18\19 year old prospects we will have no patience on developing. Good and YOUNG Defence man don’t grow on trees.

You're on a computer/phone. You know you can search on google and find this out. Urho Vaakanainen is his name :laugh:

They're not going to trade McAvoy. No need to worry there.
 

4ORRBRUIN

Registered User
Sep 27, 2005
21,768
15,691
boston
Agreed which should be in the 4.5-6 million range over 4-6 years which is what other comparable top RFA D have gotten on there 2nd contract with the only exception being Ekland who got 7.5 per

I’d say 4-5 years between 5-6 million is very fair

I would be shocked if he signs that. He would need to fire he agent
 

DrJustice

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
2,420
2,223
Boston, MA
Looks like Charlie is gonna be filling in on the powerplay for Krug.

Interested to see how that unit looks with Pastrnak back in the fold.

The notion that he can replace Krug in that spot is about to be challenged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C0ach B0mbay

RussellmaniaKW

Registered User
Sep 15, 2004
19,698
21,801
his last two games: 27:26 & 26:34 TOI

Leads the team in even strength TOI per game (24th in the league)

kid is an absolute horse & only getting better

edit: and oh btw, he's on ~44 point pace while having missed a bunch of time to injury and not being 100% for much of the time he did play and only having ONE point on the PP.
 

Emerz

#1 PLD Fanboy
Jun 5, 2013
10,115
9,244
Nova Scotia
his last two games: 27:26 & 26:34 TOI

Leads the team in even strength TOI per game (24th in the league)

kid is an absolute horse & only getting better

edit: and oh btw, he's on ~44 point pace while having missed a bunch of time to injury and not being 100% for much of the time he did play and only having ONE point on the PP.

Love watching McAvoy play, he's so smooth back there. Yeah he makes the occasional brain fart but when you're playing as much as he does, it's too be expected.

Yeah this guy plays more than anyone on the Bruins for the past 2 years, he's going to get paid big money and I don't think there's ever really a problem with having too many good players on your team.

Luckily Sweeney has shown he gets a lot of value when he re-extends players.
 

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
54,568
43,280
Hell baby
He’s a cornerstone player and they are quite fortunate to have gotten him where they did. Absolute workhorse. Love his game
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trizz617

BruinsNetwork

Guest
his last two games: 27:26 & 26:34 TOI

Leads the team in even strength TOI per game (24th in the league)

kid is an absolute horse & only getting better

edit: and oh btw, he's on ~44 point pace while having missed a bunch of time to injury and not being 100% for much of the time he did play and only having ONE point on the PP.

He had 7G-25A-32PTS in 63GP last year.

This year, he has 6G-18A-24PTS in 45GP. That also puts him on pace for 33PTS in 63GP. Sample size is only the current and last season, but that’s some nice consistency. We also haven’t even seen the best of his offensive capabilities.
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,080
20,836
Tyler, TX
He had 7G-25A-32PTS in 63GP last year.

This year, he has 6G-18A-24PTS in 45GP. That also puts him on pace for 33PTS in 63GP. Sample size is only the current and last season, but that’s some nice consistency. We also haven’t even seen the best of his offensive capabilities.

I agree, he's only just getting going with side of his game. Plus, most high scoring d-men in the league pick up a lot of their points on the PP. Charlie doesn't get much quality PP time at this point. If he took over Krug's spot on the #1 unit (not saying he will or should right now) we'd see a point spike from him. He'd start looking like a 50-60 point guy I think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->