Milhouse40
Registered User
- Aug 19, 2010
- 22,107
- 24,685
at the very least right now, Hudon adds an important offensive spark to the 4th line.
His lack of foot speed will always be a problem. But, the Domi-Drouin line has at least often been dangerous with him on it. It was often really stagnant with Armia on it. I'm fine with ending the experiment now, but also ok with seeing if they can start to convert the chances he's been creating. Last night was his least dangerous offensively. I'm also going to give him the benefit of the doubt as far as being able to control his stick and not get penalties.
I was more sold on Hudon last year and before this year started. These past games with Domi and Drouin have not been conclusive... at least the last two.
And when Byron comes back, I think I still prefer Shaw and Delo on the 4th with Peca or Plekanec. Delo is catching up after missing time.
Ironically, he had a very good game last night on the fourth line and the Domi line produced without him.I haven't had the chance to catch the last couple of games, which is a shame because I've been a big fan of Hudon's game and I like his potential as a scoring middle six winger.
But he has clear limitations to his game, and the biggest one is his skating. When you're smallish, not very strong on the puck, and an average skater, you're not building off a very strong footing. It's a shame because he's a smart playmaker with good instincts and a deceptive shot, but I don't know if he'll ever be able to find the consistency to stick around in a scoring role. He really needs to capitalize on the opportunity to produce he's being given, because these don't come around very often with the depth we have on the wings.
Hudon has always made the 4th line the best it's been and should never have been scratched in the first place. He also brings out the best in Peca.Ironically, he had a very good game last night on the fourth line and the Domi line produced without him.
Seems like a Benn-Juulsen pairing next game.
yup that seems right. Once Armia comes back I wonder who goes?
Hopefully not Peca but I have feeling it's going to be Peca. ("We feel with his 2 year contract , he is less likely to get picked up"...)
Probably something they should have considered doing before the rest of the league recognized they have to trade him because of their roster crunch.Should try to trade him before we Scherbak him. It's pretty obvious that he failed to improve his skating at all in the summer and when the Habs got substantially faster, Hudon became a misfit. I think there still could be a middle six future for him somewhere in the NHL but that won't be in Montreal. Love his skillset and tenacity and he makes smart decisions most of the time but his skating can't support it at all on a team relying so heavily in fast transition as the Habs are this year.
I haven't watched much Habs recently, is Agostino really better than Hudon?
He's a better 4th line winger...I haven't watched much Habs recently, is Agostino really better than Hudon?
He's a better 4th line winger...
Meanwhile Drouin/Shaw, Gallagher/Tatar, Byron/Lehkonen
Are all better top 9 wingers.
In other words, he currently doesn't have a seat.
Hudon's like an insurance policy for CJ in case one of his wingers on the top 9 stops producing or gets hurt, he can plug Hudon in there.I buy that analysis. Agostino, a point producer at the AHL level who already won an MVP award for it, realized that he needed to adjust his game to stick around the NHL more permanently and not necessarily look to become a primarily scoring winger, He,s great on the forecheck and can play two-way hockey.
IMO, Hudon needs to play with quality line mates in a more offensive role as, at least, a 3rd line player to get the most out of him. Right now, Agostino is a better 4th line player than Hudon and deserves to be in the line up better than Hudon, or Scherbak, who was let go on waivers, for example.
Would Hudon be better than Agostino in a 3rd line role? I'm not sure, either, but Hudon would be a better goal scorer, I think. Overall offense, it could actually be a wash...
Hopefully not Peca but I have feeling it's going to be Peca. ("We feel with his 2 year contract , he is less likely to get picked up"...)
Would be stupid if they waive Hudon... This year would be one of the worst seasons I can recall in terms of asset management, yes losing fringe players is bad asset management when instead of recouping assets you lose them for nothing. If (since this is obviously a hypothetical) you would have told me that all 3 of Scherbak, DLR and Hudon would be gone from this organization via waivers, I'd be pissed. Especially when you add in the fact that they were moved aside for older players that have been rotting in the AHL. It's nice to try to find the next Begin/Darche value but not when it comes at the expense of young players. I think Hudon's days are numbered. I think he can build a niche for himself like Parenteau did.I have Peca behind Chaput, Agostino, and Hudon (because of his potential). And the 4th line has been better with D-lo than Peca.
I think it will be Peca or Hudon, and I think it's a bit early to give up on Hudon - that would make Hudon, Scherbak, and DLR all given up on in the first half of the season.
Would be stupid if they waive Hudon... This year would be one of the worst seasons I can recall in terms of asset management, yes losing fringe players is bad asset management when instead of recouping assets you lose them for nothing. If (since this is obviously a hypothetical) you would have told me that all 3 of Scherbak, DLR and Hudon would be gone from this organization via waivers, I'd be pissed. Especially when you add in the fact that they were moved aside for older players that have been rotting in the AHL. It's nice to try to find the next Begin/Darche value but not when it comes at the expense of young players. I think Hudon's days are numbered. I think he can build a niche for himself like Parenteau did.
Regarding Scherbak, what is different between him and a guy like Sprong? Or Hudon and M. Perreault when he was traded?
Subpar defensive game, underwhelming stats at NHL level (42 GP & 9 pts) and comparable age/AHL stats. One returned a good project (Pettersson) the other was on waivers. Both required waivers. I mentioned Perreault, not Parenteau for trade value. The Caps traded him in 2013 (so around Hudon's current age) for a 4th round pick. He was coming seasons in the 30 pts range too.I don't know Sprong...
Parenteau excelled before the game got faster. As it got faster and faster, he became less and less effective. Not sure he would have been very effective in the NHL of 2018, even in his prime.
Hudon's like an insurance policy for CJ in case one of his wingers on the top 9 stops producing or gets hurt, he can plug Hudon in there.
Not really fair to Hudon but that's just the way it's going for him right now.
He's a better 4th line winger...
Meanwhile Drouin/Shaw, Gallagher/Tatar, Byron/Lehkonen
Are all better top 9 wingers.
In other words, he currently doesn't have a seat.