Sundinisagod
****
What statement about him being a Norris candidate?
It was my statement, where I said that was his upside. I question how much higher is Chabot's upside than that?
What statement about him being a Norris candidate?
What statement about him being a Norris candidate?
Yes but he has not received any Norris votes up to this point in his career... obviously if he continues having the season hes having this year hell def be in the talks at the end of the year but still has a long way to go until then.There is lot more than a 15 game sample size. It is based on his progression until now.
Considering he has 4 goals and 20 points, I don't think that is very likely if you cared to do the mathAren’t over 75% of Chabot’s points secondary assists?
I said that? Also I'm making the argument that calling Chabot currently better is way premature. I don't doubt he will eventually be better but it can't be after so few games, where Rielly has been one of the league's best defensemen in the same period of time. Also Rielly was elite last year. He was one of three defensemen in the league to play against the top percentile of competition, score 50 points and be a positive possession player. The other two were Doughty and Hedman."Rielly's ceiling is Norris trophy or candidate, what would "a much higher ceiling" be?"
^
That is still yet to be proven if hell ever win a Norris, or even be a candidate. If you base it on 15 games this year then yea he would be a Norris candidate but still a long season to go.
"Rielly's ceiling is Norris trophy or candidate, what would "a much higher ceiling" be?"
^
That is still yet to be proven if hell ever win a Norris, or even be a candidate. If you base it on 15 games this year then yea he would be a Norris candidate but still a long season to go.
The question is who would you choose to build your defense around tho… so yes right now id agree rielly is better/ more body of work... more expierence etc.I said that? Also I'm making the argument that calling Chabot currently better is way premature. I don't doubt he will eventually be better but it can't be after so few games, where Rielly has been one of the league's best defensemen in the same period of time. Also Rielly was elite last year. He was one of three defensemen in the league to play against the top percentile of competition, score 50 points and be a positive possession player. The other two were Doughty and Hedman.
As of before yesterday’s games, 11 of his points were secondary assists. Not sure about the 3 pts last night though.Considering he has 4 goals and 20 points, I don't think that is very likely if you cared to do the math
As of before yesterday’s games, 11 of his points were secondary assists. Not sure about the 3 pts last night though.
So, the math? He would need 1 primary assist for what you said to be incorrectAs of before yesterday’s games, 11 of his points were secondary assists. Not sure about the 3 pts last night though.
No he isn't. Rielly plays against some of the toughest competition in the league, has good advanced stats and is amongst the leaders in the NHL in D points right now. Nevermind he has a track record. How is Chabot already better?
Considering he has 4 goals and 20 points, I don't think that is very likely if you cared to do the math
Geez this place. I should’ve said 71.07%.So, the math? He would need 1 primary assist for what you said to be incorrect
It's no surprise the top 6 on the list of secondary assists are defenseman, the guys who are pushing the play towards the net...
The crux of the matter is that a significantly large percentage of points have been secondary assists.Why focus on math when you can focus on hyperbole?
Secondary assists are far easier to fluke off than primary assists and goals.Is that supposed to mean anything negative or....
Or the same people that watched him dominate Jr like no other D man has in a very long time. You know maybe those are the posters you are talking about.
Secondary assists are far easier to fluke off than primary assists and goals.
In those extreme ends of the spectrum you choose to use, arguable. In general, the primary assist is more influential in obtaining the goal.Is it easier to thwart a forcheck and beat three players with your skating and puck movement creating an odd man rush or is it easier to one touch a pass on the power play. You tell me.
Geez this place. I should’ve said 71.07%.
Secondary assists are far easier to fluke off than primary assists and goals.
You’re right. I forgot the sensitivity levels of this website.Or really anything that wasn't demonstrably false.
He has 1 less primary assist than Rielly, if you want to go that way...Geez this place. I should’ve said 71.07%.