Confirmed Signing with Link: [CGY] Re-signs Jankowski [2 years @ 1.675mil AAV]

[Taytro]

Click to read more...

 

[Saekk]

Seems like a rather decent deal.

 

[Snakepit]

Seems pretty fair for both sides. Just avoids arbitration too

 

[DRW204]

best player of the 2012 draft

 

[Skinnyjimmy08]

Thats fair.. Good for both sides

 

[BoldNewLettuce]

Whete is feaster anyway?

 

[jfhabs]

Great deal!

If Bergevin was any smart he would've offer sheet this guy at 3-4M for 5-6 years

 

[Lunatik]

sorry mods, somehow I missed the other thread

 

[Lunatik]

best player of the 2012 draft

Only 4 posts for the least original joke going

Great deal!

If Bergevin was any smart he would've offer sheet this guy at 3-4M for 5-6 years

Jankowski filed for arbitration, he was ineligible for an offer sheet.

Also, your suggestion almost guarantees giving up the Habs 2019 1st round pick, so I wish he had too.

 

[jfhabs]

Only 4 posts for the least original joke going

Jankowski filed for arbitration, he was ineligible for an offer sheet.

Oh yea forgot about that rule. Is Hanifin doing the same?

 

[Lunatik]

Oh yea forgot about that rule. Is Hanifin doing the same?

He's not old enough for arbitration, but an offer-sheet we won't match will cost you you 1st round pick and considering you guys should be in the running for a top 3 pick, it doesn't seem like the smartest idea

 

[ck26]

Only 4 posts for the least original joke going

Why joke? Hasn't been the best in the draft, but considering how poor the 2012 first round was, Jankowski's steady development and the fact that CGY got him in the 20s is pretty interesting. He's getting close to the finished product as a player but if Jankowski puts up 40 points next year, that pick -- and this contract -- looks pretty dang good.

 

[Price is Wright]

Why joke? Hasn't been the best in the draft, but considering how poor the 2012 first round was, Jankowski's steady development and the fact that CGY got him in the 20s is pretty interesting. He's getting close to the finished product as a player but if Jankowski puts up 40 points next year, that pick -- and this contract -- looks pretty dang good.

Yeah, those "comparable to Martin Frk" offensive stats are pretty interesting.

Jankowski is part of the reason why the 2012 first round is considered poor.

 

[Lunatik]

Why joke? Hasn't been the best in the draft, but considering how poor the 2012 first round was, Jankowski's steady development and the fact that CGY got him in the 20s is pretty interesting. He's getting close to the finished product as a player but if Jankowski puts up 40 points next year, that pick -- and this contract -- looks pretty dang good.

It's a joke that has been made millions of times since the, it's run it's course and needs to die

 

[Lunatik]

Yeah, those "comparable to Martin Frk" offensive stats are pretty interesting.

Jankowski is part of the reason why the 2012 first round is considered poor.

A late first is hardly the reason why that round is considered poor. It is considered poor Because of picks like Takupov, Murray, Pouliot going in the top 10

 

[jfhabs]

He's not old enough for arbitration, but an offer-sheet we won't match will cost you you 1st round pick and considering you guys should be in the running for a top 3 pick, it doesn't seem like the smartest idea

Yea I know, that's why I wouldn't offer more than 4.08... but Hanifin is easily worth that so the Flames would equal that pretty easily.

 

[Kaen]

Reasonable show-me bridge contract. Should work out for both player and team.

 

[L4br3cqu3]

Great deal!

If Bergevin was any smart he would've offer sheet this guy at 3-4M for 5-6 years

When was the last time an offer sheet was made ?

Doing so might get you said player, but after that you get a target on your back for a long time, so pretty dumb overall.

And the smart thing to do right now for the Habs is to keep all our likely high picks, not give em away...

 

[jfhabs]

When was the last time an offer sheet was made ?

Doing so might get you said player, but after that you get a target on your back for a long time, so pretty dumb overall.

And the smart thing to do right now for the Habs is to keep all our likely high picks, not give em away...

It's not giving them away if you get a good young player in return... I like Jankowski and I think is easily worth more then a second round pick, even at 3.5M.

So we get a target on our back, but who do we have to resign exactly in the coming years? If we don't match we get picks... great! If we really want to match we (Molson) have the money to do so. If you give fair offers to your RFA players, they'll just sign. They won't even be in the offersheet window.

 

[Agalloch]

It's not giving them away if you get a good young player in return... I like Jankowski and I think is easily worth more then a second round pick, even at 3.5M.

So we get a target on our back, but who do we have to resign exactly in the coming years? If we don't match we get picks... great! If we really want to match we (Molson) have the money to do so. If you give fair offers to your RFA players, they'll just sign. They won't even be in the offersheet window.

It was impossible to sign him anyway because he went to arbitration.

 

[SoundAndFury]

It's a joke that has been made millions of times since the, it's run it's course and needs to die

No, it doesn't because Feaster deserves to be ridiculed for picking player projected to go late 3rd round at #21. That line is as hilarious now as it was 5 years ago and it was bound to be unless Jankowski actually came close to being the best player in the draft.

 

[Kranix]

Big breakout year coming for Jankowski

 

[jfhabs]

It was impossible to sign him anyway because he went to arbitration.

Yes, another poster mentioned it before. Thanks!
This was more speculative, but it shouldn't be discussed in this thread anyway. Cheers

 

[Volica]

Yeah, those "comparable to Martin Frk" offensive stats are pretty interesting.

Jankowski is part of the reason why the 2012 first round is considered poor.

Getting a big, strong, third line centre with some upside in the 20's of the first round makes it poor?
The top 10 of that draft is what makes it poor.

 

[Volica]

It's not giving them away if you get a good young player in return... I like Jankowski and I think is easily worth more then a second round pick, even at 3.5M.

So we get a target on our back, but who do we have to resign exactly in the coming years? If we don't match we get picks... great! If we really want to match we (Molson) have the money to do so. If you give fair offers to your RFA players, they'll just sign. They won't even be in the offersheet window.

f***, why don't we just swing a trade? That unprotected first, we give you Janko. You get him at a better cap and he'll still be RFA after the deal