spfan
Registered User
- May 4, 2009
- 1,698
- 416
This is the most "I checked out hockeyDB, let me make a hot take here." post on this thread.
#greatwork #congrats
hockeydb doesn't show TOI.
And I never claimed Andersson is good or bad.
But people were contradicting each other in saying he's a top 4 and some saying he's top pairing.
He plays 20+ mins sometimes, but he played less most of the time. Hence why 4 other d-men on their team average more ice time. Thus making him not top 4 at this current point of his career. Him hardly getting PK time also shows they trust 5 other d-men more than him.
I'm not saying he can't grow, but right now he doesn't look worth this pretty big contract. The length and salary per year.
He also gets easier match ups. He's not facing top lines. Giordano is.
I can compare him to a player on my own team. John Marino. Also a RHD who is on the 3rd pairing most of the time. But his point production is better and also trusted with PK time. And it's not really a lack of depth. He's playing behind Letang and Schultz. Heck, he wasn't even supposed to be a regular on the team, but he worked his way on it and earned more ice time. But I'd even worry about him getting a contract like this, this early on.
I get you have to overpay a lot, but this also ends up with bad contracts a lot too.
Look at Subban right now. Everyone claimed how Habs made a huge mistake trading for Weber and letting go of Subban because of age. Weber looks far better right now still. Contracts can end up looking bad.
Andersson is young though. I'm not claiming he can't progress from here. Just think this is a fairly big gamble.