Prospect Info: CBJ Prospect Thread X

Discussion in 'Columbus Blue Jackets' started by Viqsi, Oct 20, 2020.

  1. Viqsi just pointing to the scoreboard

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    44,720
    Likes Received:
    14,530
    Trophy Points:
    205
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Jackets 1st, Preds 2nd
    Location:
    K├Âlumboos
  2. DarkandStormy Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    4,376
    Likes Received:
    796
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Location:
    614
    CBJ Board 2019 Prospect Rankings

    I was looking up last year's prospect rankings for whenever we do 2020 and came across this:
    For our purposes, Elvis was no longer a prospect, but I think our rankings were a bit better. I'd say we rated Gavrikov much better than Pronman (10th lol) as well as Peeke (13th??). We probably slept a bit on Voronkov and Marchenko.
     
  3. DoggyII Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    738
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Occupation:
    Former Innkeeper...practicing retirement :)
    Location:
    Peterborough, NH
    Thanks D&S. I think that chart is a great example that nobody is going to get every ranking right. Pronman had Gavrikov 10 and Peeke 13 where one is now entrenched as a 2nd pairing d-man and the other one looks to be at least an NHL d-man and perhaps a 2nd pairing d-man when he hits his Peeke.

    Its why I am not sweating his mediocre evaluation of Chinakhov.
     
  4. majormajor Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2018
    Messages:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    5,519
    Trophy Points:
    101
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    The Blue Jackets have a very interesting connection to Siberia. The team has a great group of Russian prospects, and all four of them hail from Siberia, despite Siberia having only 22% of the Russian population.

    Chinakhov - Omsk
    Marchenko - Barnaul
    Tarasov - Novokuznetsk
    Voronkov - Angarsk (near Irkutsk)

    Not only that, Bobrovsky is Siberian, from Novokuznetsk, and Panarin is from the outskirts of Chelyabinsk, just inside the Asian border. You can say that Siberians have been very good for this franchise. Even recent signee Grigorenko is from Siberia, born in the Far East city of Khabarovsk. The two big busts - Zherdev and Filatov - were both European. Though to be fair to Europeans, I must mention that Gavrikov and Tyutin are also from that continent.
     
    thebus88, Magnifico, Viqsi and 5 others like this.
  5. Gagnefan924 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2009
    Messages:
    9,364
    Likes Received:
    497
    Trophy Points:
    120
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Location:
    PA
    Interesting insights, I look at Marchenko and I just think Kucherov where Chinakhov has more of a Ovi flair, obviously not saying they will be either of those players just play styles to me
     
  6. DoggyII Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    738
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Occupation:
    Former Innkeeper...practicing retirement :)
    Location:
    Peterborough, NH
    Irkutsk? I am invading Irkutsk from Kamchatka! Man I loved RISK!
     
  7. majormajor Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2018
    Messages:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    5,519
    Trophy Points:
    101
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
  8. ViD #CBJNeedHugs

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    19,472
    Likes Received:
    5,572
    Trophy Points:
    187
    SB Cash:
    $ 42,000
    Location:
    Blue Jackets Area
    You forgot Arty from Yaroslavl (European part) and Svitov (Omsk)
     
    majormajor likes this.
  9. neelynugs Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    33,775
    Likes Received:
    4,852
    Trophy Points:
    231
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    how do you see the top 10 right now? i love marchenko by the way, very impressive prospect.
    was hoping bruins would take him.
     
  10. Byrral Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Messages:
    4,961
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    Trophy Points:
    139
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Great question. Depends on the criteria you're looking for. Who is considered a prospect and what the voting criteria? For example I believe that Texier, Bemstrom and Gavroikov are still prospects (none have played 82 games in the NHL) although they may have graduated according your criteria. Secondly in last years poll Marchenko wasn't even available to vote on until poll #5 and he was passed over in poll #4 for prospects such as Veini Vehvilainen and Trey Fix-Wolanski. That's not a knock on those prospects or the process of how the polls are chosen. Just pointing out the board voting criteria from last year.

    I'm not as versed on prospects like many around here but I have liked Marchenko as a prospect since he was drafted, There were 3 of us who voted him as our 5th rated prospect last season. Would I have have ranked him 4th over Foudy last season (who I voted for in poll #4) I'm not sure. Just pointing out he wasn't available as a choice for me until the 5th poll.
     
  11. Double-Shift Lasse Just post better

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    27,180
    Likes Received:
    5,212
    Trophy Points:
    241
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Location:
    Semirural Cbus
    I know you said it's not a knock, but after the first poll, the newly-added player is by board vote. Thus, this language from last year's first poll:

    The first five was hard, I thought. Three obvious choices from among last year's initial five, then I added Bemstrom even though he was lower in our rankings last year, and Peeke, even though he was below Marchenko in our vote as well. If you guys like Kirill or one of the goalies, vote to add them and fix my mistake.

    But really this is just a good opportunity as any to let the board know we're going to start this year's polling on Monday. There's a little clean-up to do on the list and a decision on who are the first five, but other than that, everybody's favorite offseason exercise (and by favorite, I mean favorite to complain about) will soon be here.
     
    Cowumbus, DarkandStormy and Byrral like this.
  12. DarkandStormy Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    4,376
    Likes Received:
    796
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Location:
    614
    We'll be doing the 2020 Prospect Rankings soon, so we can see how that plays out. I haven't settled on a top 10 yet, but...

    Top tier (3): Foudy, Peeke, Marchenko
    Second tier (2): Chinakhov, Tarasov
    From there, it gets a little weird because people may value upside over a known quantity (thinking of someone like Stenlund here, who may have a niche 4th line / PP specialist type role in the NHL).
    So then, it's sort of like a "low ceiling, high floor" kind of tier, which might mix in with the tier below (3, maybe 4): Stenlund, Vehvilainen, Voronkov, maybe Kivlenieks
    Then it's mostly younger guys, a little less proven who maybe have upside but could also bust (4) : Hjorth, Berni, Fix-Wolansky, Pyythia

    That's just my view - I'm probably forgetting someone, somewhere. There's also a tier of guys with some NHL experience but seem to be "career AHLers" for now, and not sure how I value that (in relation to the 2019/2020 draftees not listed) - Carlsson, Sherwood, MacInnis, Thurkauf. There are also a couple undrafted signees that I have no idea about and need to read up on.
     
    neelynugs and Monk like this.
  13. Byrral Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Messages:
    4,961
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    Trophy Points:
    139
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Yes. To be clear that was not a criticism in any way of the process. Transparency is important if everyones definition of what a prospect is is different. Thanks for clearing that up.
     
    Double-Shift Lasse likes this.
  14. DoggyII Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    738
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Occupation:
    Former Innkeeper...practicing retirement :)
    Location:
    Peterborough, NH
    I think the criteria for who qualifies as a prospect is harder than usual this year since last season was not a full season.
    • I hardly think Gavrikov qualifies as a prospect anymore because he is entrenched as our second pair d-man and had been all of last season plus the playoffs. He's an established NHLer already.
    • I tend to lean towards no for Tex because I think he has solidified a spot as well and only missed games last year for injury issues.
    • Bemmer was in and out of the lineup for performance reasons so I say he is still a prospect.
    • Foudy is a prospect despite the fact it ill be hard for him to not make the club this year. He played in the playoffs but he is hardly established in any way.
    But...not my decision.
     
    cslebn and Double-Shift Lasse like this.
  15. pled Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    761
    Trophy Points:
    139
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    just use old hockey future criteria ?

    Gav isn't a prospect.
    Foundy is.
    Bem and Tex is up to the leader of whoever make the list if they consider them roster lock or not.

    NHL Prospect Criteria - Hockey's Future

    my prospect list for vote would be:

    G: Tarasov, Thome, Veini
    D: Berni, Ole, Carlsson, Christiansen, Hjorth, Johannesson, Knazko, Peeke, Stucker,
    F: Angle, Chinakhov, TFW, Foudy, Howarth, Karlberg, Marchenko, Pu, Pyyhtia, Sheerwood Stenlund, Thurkauf, Voronkov
    +Bem/Tex if you fell like it
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2020
  16. pled Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    761
    Trophy Points:
    139
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    since the draft chinakhov is 1g 1a in 4 games, 15:42min -03 0pim 10sog 1hit 1bls

    kinda worse than his 4 game previous to the draft but still not bad.

    for comparison 4 game before draft : 4g 0a 16:05 min +-0 2pim 8sog 3hits 1bls

    Marchenko last 4: 3g 1a 15:25min -01 2pim 8sog 4hits 2bls

    Voronkov last 4: 0g 1a 15:10min +-0 4pim 9sog 10hits 1bls

    both are 1 year older than Chinakhov and Marchenko was down in MHL before those 4 games. I guess it's harder to get a roster spot on SKA
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2020
    Michael Smitley likes this.
  17. ViD #CBJNeedHugs

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    19,472
    Likes Received:
    5,572
    Trophy Points:
    187
    SB Cash:
    $ 42,000
    Location:
    Blue Jackets Area
    Avangard Omsk signed none other than Nail Yakupov today, Chinakhov will have some help in prepping for post game interviews
     
    WubbaLubbaDubDub likes this.
  18. pled Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    761
    Trophy Points:
    139
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    he was traded not signed but pretty much the same. trade for money are still a thing in khl. kinda hope chinakhov end up better than him anyway.
     
  19. majormajor Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2018
    Messages:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    5,519
    Trophy Points:
    101
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Don't worry about it. Lists are subjective, people can be kindly reminded to chill tfo.

    What the actual f***!!! No Voronkov in top 5? Do you even watch hockey???

    :sarcasm:

    So in all seriousness I would put Voronkov ahead of Tarasov, but it's all conjecture and kind of cool that we come up with different lists. Blind men find an elephant...
     
  20. majormajor Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2018
    Messages:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    5,519
    Trophy Points:
    101
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    It's a fun challenge figuring out how to compare Foudy to the Russian prospects. Here's the one tournament where he squared off with Marchenko and Voronkov, last year's World Juniors. There's the prelim game and this, the gold medal game:



    Ten seconds in, Voronkov absolutely crunches some kid. Man among boys out there. Foudy then hits the post on his first shift a minute or so later. Marchenko ended up with plenty of scoring chances throughout the game.

    You can see some of what we know about these kids through this game alone: Foudy is a big threat on the PK. He's not a good puckhandler and not a PP guy, but he makes crafty plays and breaks open the D with his speed, which helps his linemates a lot. He won't be a big scorer but he's a lock to fit in the middle of an NHL lineup, he's a very useful player. Voronkov is also very useful in different ways. He levels guys, he's screening the goalie frequently, 5v5 and PP, and he's a good PK guy as well. Torts would love him. Marchenko makes something out of nothing, he's a rare talent.
     
  21. majormajor Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2018
    Messages:
    6,913
    Likes Received:
    5,519
    Trophy Points:
    101
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Putting this here to stay on topic:

    I think they could be a line. Voronkov isn't the same kind of high-end skill but I think he'd complement Marchenko and Chinakhov well. If it's unlikely it's unlikely more because there is no point in putting three young players on the same line for little reason. It helps to speak the same language but we need them all able to speak basic English when they arrive or we have bigger problems.

    They haven't played together before except for maybe a few games where Chinakhov played on the U20 international squad last year. He didn't make the WJC tournament, where the older guys Marchenko and Voronkov did play together. They connected on some plays on the same line actually, though they were back to separate lines by the final games. They all came up on separate Siberian youth clubs and joined separate KHL franchises. They're all late-bloomers and weren't the top guys for international play until recently.
     
  22. pled Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    761
    Trophy Points:
    139
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    I think the top4/6 is pretty clear to everyone as Chinakhov, Foudy, Machenko, Peeke +Bem/Tex if we include them. it will be the next one that will probably be much more debatable. my pick would be VV so we have lots of different opinion here for the 5/7th best prospect.
     
  23. ViD #CBJNeedHugs

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    19,472
    Likes Received:
    5,572
    Trophy Points:
    187
    SB Cash:
    $ 42,000
    Location:
    Blue Jackets Area
    Chinakhov with 2 assists so far today
     
  24. pled Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    761
    Trophy Points:
    139
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    3*

    2 of them on the PP gosh if him and Marchenko can bring that PP power to the jackets it would be a dream

    Yakupov scored in his first game too not that I care he kinda steal some ice time from our boy but if chinakhov play over 15m everynight at least I'll be ok with that
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2020
  25. Caser @RUSProspects

    Joined:
    May 21, 2013
    Messages:
    8,598
    Likes Received:
    4,936
    Trophy Points:
    146
    SB Cash:
    $ 50,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    IT&T
    Location:
    Riga/Yaroslavl
    Home Page:
    Only one of those three assists was primary, was a good one though:

     
    DoggyII and Gagnefan924 like this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"