CantLoseWithMatthews
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2015
- 49,693
- 59,394
Yep, and another against Montreal right after. It's pretty laughableWe play another back to back already? holy
Yep, and another against Montreal right after. It's pretty laughableWe play another back to back already? holy
I really think that he has nothing to lose if he tries it. Actually he will increase his standing with fans and it seems like a no lose situation. If Nylander fails as a C - everybody would support playing him at W for all the years up to now. If he actually does well - that means extra job security for him, since we will be winning more games. I guess after JT comes back all of this becomes irrelevant, but in the short term I think such line up switches can only help us and keep the opponents guessing. The other theory would be if Willy specifically said that he doesn't want to play C and will not do it, but I doubt this, since he has done it in the past. I know that his defense is not the best, but could it really lead to such a failure in a single game?
While that sounds fine, the idea is to not chance the points the first night. With how inconsistent their play has been, Columbus could possibly win with Hutchinson in net, which would mean Andersen with a tired team in Boston.
Of the many of Babcock quirks, this isn't an issue really IMO. I think with a back-up you have more confidence in it's much less of an issue.
I would go with Freddie for 3 of the 4 games this week if it was up to me. Not sure why we can't just give Freddie a night off at some point in a non-back to back to make up for it.In general I agree.
Against Boston? I’d rather our best foot forward against them and take the chance against Columbus.
Yeah it actually took me quite a lot of time to catch that! I was really disappointed after the first goal when he separated Matthews and Marner. I have been thinking about this since yesterday actually. The Matthews-Marner and back to Willy mind games can be actually very effective. I am really glad he is giving this a shot. I really want to believe that Babcock is becoming more open minded and not so stubborn. I really enjoyed that Matthews got so much game time too.If Tavares was out long-term, it would likely be something that is tried. But Tavares is only out a couple weeks. A major shake up isn’t really necessary.
Babcock did a great job last night of catching Boston off guard by putting Marner and Matthews together to start, then put Nylander back there, and then used Marner again in different spots. If teams don’t know if it’s Marner Matthews or Matthews Nylander coming out, it makes things tougher to match against
We play another back to back already? holy
Who the **** made the schedule ?
10 games into the season, we already have 3 back to backs
In general I agree.
Against Boston? I’d rather our best foot forward against them and take the chance against Columbus.
Yeah it actually took me quite a lot of time to catch that! I was really disappointed after the first goal when he separated Matthews and Marner. I have been thinking about this since yesterday actually. The Matthews-Marner and back to Willy mind games can be actually very effective. I am really glad he is giving this a shot. I really want to believe that Babcock is becoming more open minded and not so stubborn. I really enjoyed that Matthews got so much game time too.
Andersen is always going to start the first game of a back to back. I don't know why this is talked about ad nauseam or there is confusion about it.
Johnsson is probable to play. X-rays were negative, so it's likely a bruise.
Glad tampa lost in regulation keeps the atlantic division race close but holy hell did their back-up put up a show in tampa last night. 44 saves with 17 saves alone in the 3rd period.
I miss McBackup so much!!!
It's something we can debate but with Tavares, Dermott and Hyman out I'd be trying to bank every available point as well if I was Babcock
Get the points against Columbus and worry about Boston when you get there
I wasn't too impressed with how relaxed Matthews and Marner played when going up against Marchand and Pasta. Hutch is going to get lit up if they repeat that.
playing all of them against divisional rivals when they are rested.
Richest organization in the league and they haven't called out this unfair scheduling that gives divisional rivals unfair advantage.
would be nice if Shanny and Dubas grew a back-bone and told the league to shove it
Are you sure they didn't voice their displeasure?
Mind games indeed
Cassidy is refering to Matthews and Marner together, not having to deal with the switch.
Not that the switch was all that advantageous. Id just have soon let Matthews and Marner play it out and shelter Willy with Spezza if it's all that integral.
Gotta love 2 guys that think the game like Matthews and Marner together long term.
Early last week Bunkis, on Good Show, said not playing these two together may end up being one of the big 'what ifs', should the Leafs not become champs.
It's not like Tavares would be left in the cold either, Nylander plays a game that's nearly perfect for Tavares. He doesn't need Marner's cross crease passes to succeed, having Nylander gain the zone and cycle with him down low is right in his wheelhouse.
Yep, and another against Montreal right after. It's pretty laughable