Seems that this signing didn't Peeke the interest of the general public.only 2 comments all day? no love for Peeke.
Good signing
A lot of other teams like Vancouver were hoping to trade for Andrew and then pair him with an offensive d-man. I think folks are still a bit angry/disappointed that no trade happened, and it may take a couple days to get over it.only 2 comments all day? no love for Peeke.
Good signing
Shut your dirty mouth.Seems that this signing didn't Peeke the interest of the general public.
Honestly I had to learn myself exactly who this guy is. Can he become a Tanev type?only 2 comments all day? no love for Peeke.
Good signing
I really like his game. Good signing for sure. He is one of the better Defensive D in the league and will probably only get better.
Honestly I had to learn myself exactly who this guy is. Can he become a Tanev type?
Hes 210 now, going into last year he was only listed at 196. The added weight should serve him well.Andrew Peeke is a Tanev type. Just not as good with passing.
But like Tanev he is fast and shuts things down quickly.
Actually more physical - very strong hitter, you'd think he was 230 lbs not 210, and he's one of those D that just knows how to get in the way and block everything, like a second goalie when he's around the net.
Unfortunately there is a big gap between his play without the puck (stellar) and his play with it (well below average). The contract seems fair.
Canucks could ah w drafted him in 2016 but they dealt their 2nd round pick to acquire gudbranson.Andrew Peeke is a Tanev type. Just not as good with passing.
But like Tanev he is fast and shuts things down quickly.
Actually more physical - very strong hitter, you'd think he was 230 lbs not 210, and he's one of those D that just knows how to get in the way and block everything, like a second goalie when he's around the net.
Unfortunately there is a big gap between his play without the puck (stellar) and his play with it (well below average). The contract seems fair.
honestly I have no clue I havent seen him play much in real life but from a fantasy perspective he looks like he's trending to be one hell of a DmanHonestly I had to learn myself exactly who this guy is. Can he become a Tanev type?
Hitting and blocking a ton isn't necessarily a good thing outside of fantasy hockey. See:Kris Russell. Could mean his team never has possession of the puck when he's on the ice but thats probably not the case here with the high praise he's getting here.honestly I have no clue I havent seen him play much in real life but from a fantasy perspective he looks like he's trending to be one hell of a Dman
only 24 years old put up 15 points in his first full season although he was a -14 I assume that has more to do with CBJ as a team.
hit 191 times and blocked 169 shots. played more mins than Tanev on the PK so he must be relied on a little.
I think he projects to be a nice top 4 Dman
I like him