So just fix this mess. Is Robertson good enough to replace “veteran depth” or not? It can’t be both. You are all upset because I asked you if you really believe this using specific players he might be able to replace.
BTW, for how mad you are getting I haven’t even said if I agree with this or not.
To your bold, I think youre projecting a bit or misreading everything with a negative tone.
He was good enough to play in the regular season (Hence how he started game 1 with the team), he would have had more time to show himself except for the injury and maybe the leafs wouldnt have had to go and get the playoff depth. He is not good enough to replace NHL players like Foligno, Hyman or Kerfoot at this stage in his career. The players you listed, with the exemption of Gally, are not players he is in the running to replace. They dont play the same style or role. You dont put young rookies in checking lines of the NHL when they have been a scoring forward their entire career, let alone in the playoffs.
As for Gally, I believe he is good enough to replace him but Gally got his chance and ran with it and was fantastic, so there was no need to waste a year of Robertsons ELC.
In summary, to make it very very obvious what im saying. He is GOOD ENOUGH to play in the NHL over some of the depth players, none of whom are even in the lineup. He isnt good enough to take the role from Foligno or Hyman.
Also notice the quote you picked had specified about Caufield in it, so never was it off topic to bring caufield back into the conversation. Especially in a Caufield vs Robertson thread, so maybe stop calling it off topic.