Captain Boroweicki

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
28,560
9,065
Last time I checked this is the NHL and just like I won't accept Dorion's "A FOR EFFORT" bull****, I'm not going to accept "Mark Borowiecki works really hard". Sports is results based. Mark Borowiecki's results are terrible and yet we keep re-signing him and playing him.

And yes, there are 4 other players on the ice and a goalie but at a certain point if the goalie changes, the defensive partner changes, the forward lines change... the only common denominator in Borowiecki's awful stat lines is.... Mark Borowiecki. If everything changes and you (Borowiecki) stay the same... and we still lose the game or get outscored... YOU are the problem, not the 4 other guys and the goalie.
There are so many other problems with this team than the 6th D, to blame him for all that ails this team is wrong & people love to pile on the guy as the object of their hatred. It's a team game & everyone on the ice takes blame for goals against as they do for goals for.
 

Knave

Registered User
Mar 6, 2007
21,632
2,226
Ottawa
There are so many other problems with this team than the 6th D, to blame him for all that ails this team is wrong & people love to pile on the guy as the object of their hatred. It's a team game & everyone on the ice takes blame for goals against as they do for goals for.

He is really bad. He's not the reason we are in last place but like I've said a bunch of times now: he's the easiest fix. You can replace him with almost anyone and improve.

Ride him out until the end of the season if you really want but then it's time to sign an UFA, ideally a reasonably good one so we can shove everyone down one on the depth charge and scratch Borowiecki.
 

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
28,560
9,065
He is really bad. He's not the reason we are in last place but like I've said a bunch of times now: he's the easiest fix. You can replace him with almost anyone and improve.

Ride him out until the end of the season if you really want but then it's time to sign an UFA, ideally a reasonably good one so we can shove everyone down one on the depth charge and scratch Borowiecki.
They've had guys replace him numerous times this yr because of injuries he sustained blocking shots, fighting for his teammates & from his monstrous hits. And every time the COACH, not EM puts him right back in there when he comes back from injury. On a side note, you should read what Crawford had to say about losing Smith & him not playing last night & his importance to the team. Not at all what I read about him on here either.
 

BonkTastic

ಠ_ಠ
Nov 9, 2010
30,901
10,092
Parts Unknown
Also, no hes not most likely to be scored on. You have to prove that and you haven't. Anyone can make things up.

I ran the numbers in excel.

Based strictly on goals per minute on the ice, with NO OTHER CONTEXT (ie: usage, matchups, anything at all), he's the 2nd worst defenceman after Ceci, despite playing the fewest minutes out of anyone in our top-6 (top-6 being defined strictly by # of minutes played).


DEFENCEGAMINSGA/min
Ceci10315290.067
Borowiecki517760.066
Harpur538400.063
Wideman162570.0625
DeMelo8313420.0621
Chabot9215190.0605
Lajoie6410580.0604
Jaros467740.059
Wolanin214080.051
FORWARDSGAMINSGA/min
Pyatt (lol)314330.071
Tierney8612640.068
Boedker639490.0664
Dzingel6710110.0662
Duchene639620.065
Paajarvi609810.061
White6210240.060
Ryan6411420.056
Stone6612130.054
Pageau305640.053
Tkachuk5310020.0528
Z. Smith (!!!)5310650.049
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

... I'll be honest, that Zack Smith number is hella-surprising.
 

Alex1234

Registered User
Oct 14, 2014
16,160
6,293
I ran the numbers in excel.

Based strictly on goals per minute on the ice, with NO OTHER CONTEXT (ie: usage, matchups, anything at all), he's the 2nd worst defenceman after Ceci, despite playing the fewest minutes out of anyone in our top-6 (top-6 being defined strictly by # of minutes played).


DEFENCEGAMINSGA/min
Ceci10315290.067
Borowiecki517760.066
Harpur538400.063
Wideman162570.0625
DeMelo8313420.0621
Chabot9215190.0605
Lajoie6410580.0604
Jaros467740.059
Wolanin214080.051
FORWARDSGAMINSGA/min
Pyatt (lol)314330.071
Tierney8612640.068
Boedker639490.0664
Dzingel6710110.0662
Duchene639620.065
Paajarvi609810.061
White6210240.060
Ryan6411420.056
Stone6612130.054
Pageau305640.053
Tkachuk5310020.0528
Z. Smith (!!!)5310650.049
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
... I'll be honest, that Zack Smith number is hella-surprising.
Who would have thought that about Ceci and Boro...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deku and BonkTastic

solidprospect

Borveetzky
Sep 30, 2017
4,422
1,274
I wonder if your goals against per minute is higher if you kill penalties every game and the others don't. It's so nice that you include him with the other players that get to play 5 on 5 or power play all the time and not have as many goals against. Nothing predicatable there.
 

BonkTastic

ಠ_ಠ
Nov 9, 2010
30,901
10,092
Parts Unknown
I wonder if your goals against per minute is higher if you kill penalties every game and the others don't. It's so nice that you include him with the other players that get to play 5 on 5 or power play all the time and not have as many goals against. Nothing predicatable there.

I LITERALLY provided statistics for EXACTLY what was asked, and went out of my way to SPECIFICALLY mention that. There was absolutely no misdirection or malice intended on my part. The demand was for a VERY basic statistic, and I provided information on that VERY basic statistic, and even mentioned that there was no context present other than the very raw, simple numbers.

[mod]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

coladin

Registered User
Sep 18, 2009
11,805
4,497
Rebuilds take several years.

Why are you against making one small immediate improvement right now? It's like scraping your knee and breaking your arm and deciding to not clean or bandage your knee because your arm is broken. Why not treat both? Go to emergency and get your arm set and cast. Clean your knee and bandage it up.

But instead you want to do nothing about the knee, have an infection and let it fester and maybe we lose the entire leg.

That is a good analogy
 
  • Like
Reactions: BonkTastic

Knave

Registered User
Mar 6, 2007
21,632
2,226
Ottawa
Let me try to help.

If you assume a reasonable +-10% error in TOI tracking (eg a 50 sec shift could be 45-55), that means any values between .054 and .066 are equivalent

That's not how it works. You don't assume -10% for one and only one to get a desired result. How are you even getting 10%? Do you know how TOI is tracked? Have you done a study to show 10% is a reasonable assumption?

As someone skeptical of analytics I find it pretty hilarious you'll post graphics with breakdowns using TOI and support conclusions with analytics and yet here you are "THIS STUFF IS UNRELIABLE".

So now we are back to Borowiecki and the eye test. And it says that whenever a good player gets on the ice for the opposing team, the priority of our team is to get Mark Borowiecki off the ice so we don't get scored on.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Deku

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
53,653
30,817
That is a good analogy
Idk, losing a leg seems like a serious , life changing, situation, while letting Boro play on the third pair seems like an easy to rectify nuance...

Just kidding, I agree, solid analogy. At the end of the day, why put off fixing what can be easily be done today?
 
  • Like
Reactions: coladin

BonkTastic

ಠ_ಠ
Nov 9, 2010
30,901
10,092
Parts Unknown
Since someone wanted some PK info, I went ahead and ran the same BASIC (I can't stress this enough, this is very, very basic data, with no context) formula for PK goals per minute, and Boro is basically our worst "regular" PK defenceman (I use quotes around the word "regular" because he's basically bad enough on the PK that coaches have stopped using him there regularly, though with Lajoie being sent down he's getting more minutes now than he did earlier in the season, and has picked up 2nd PK unit mins in the home stretch)

I suppose it depends how you see Jaros, but he's been used VERY sparringly on the PK this year - he's 6th in defensive PK TOI, so it's not exactly like he's a first choice this season. He's not getting the job done on the PK, but at the same time coaches are seeing that and not using him there, either. Boro isn't exactly the first guy coaches are using on the PK here either - he's 5th in Defensive PK TOI, and not exactly making a case for getting any more than the small handfull of PK time he's already getting.

DEFENCEMANSH GASH TOISH GA/min
Jaros7310.226
Borowiecki14740.190
Ceci241730.139
Lajoie141030.136
Harpur131160.112
DeMelo121200.100
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Again: these are VERY BASIC STATS. There's little context here. Please consider this caveat.


Fun Fact: this basic (BASIC!!!) data set suggests that Pageau and Zack Smith are our best PK forwards by A FRIGGING COUNTRY MILE. Pageau seems obvious, but Smith, like the last time, is quite surprising.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deku

BonkTastic

ಠ_ಠ
Nov 9, 2010
30,901
10,092
Parts Unknown
We made the playoffs with Boro before, but can that be done again, absolutely not. :sarcasm:

Jared Boll has 11 career playoff games. Bad players can be on playoff teams. It happens. What's your point?

I mean... Honestly, if that's how far back you've moved the goalposts in this debate, there's really nothing else to say, is there?
 

God Says No

Registered User
Mar 16, 2012
8,529
1,900
We made the playoffs with Boro before, but can that be done again, absolutely not. :sarcasm:

...but had the longest run without him.

Fun Fact: this basic (BASIC!!!) data set suggests that Pageau and Zack Smith are our best PK forwards by A FRIGGING COUNTRY MILE. Pageau seems obvious, but Smith, like the last time, is quite surprising.

Cool stuff, but actually I'm not surprised. He's very good at PK. That's pretty much his only redeemable quality.
 

solidprospect

Borveetzky
Sep 30, 2017
4,422
1,274
The narrative that Smith is good at defending and Boro isn't.

Worry about the guy on for 50ish goals against instead of 103.

Boro and Smith are on for about %19 of our teams goals against this year. Not their fault at all.

We actually have a checking line when young talent filters in.

Patience and stuff.
 
Last edited:

philb613

Registered User
Feb 9, 2011
376
172
Ottawa
I enjoy how passionate people are about our third pairing defenceman. Now can we start one about Ben Harpur :help:
 

Knave

Registered User
Mar 6, 2007
21,632
2,226
Ottawa
I enjoy how passionate people are about our third pairing defenceman. Now can we start one about Ben Harpur :help:

He is the easiest fix to make, you can replace him with nearly anyone and enjoy a small improvement. I don't understand why some people are so adamant that we can't bench him and we also have to dress him in our top 6 next year. And some of them think he should be our captain.

Go start a "Ben Harpur should be captain and guaranteed a roster spot regardless of his play thread".
 

branch

#GirlBoss #Vibes
Jan 12, 2008
8,848
7,238
The narrative that Smith is good at defending and Boro isn't.

Worry about the guy on for 50ish goals against instead of 103.

Boro and Smith are on for about %19 of our teams goals against this year. Not their fault at all.

We actually have a checking line when young talent filters in.

Patience and stuff.
Have you ever played hockey at a competitive level?
 

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
65,225
49,819
I enjoy how passionate people are about our third pairing defenceman. Now can we start one about Ben Harpur :help:

Too low profile. Boro is a marginal NHL Dman. He has tremendous passion and he plays with grit and effort. A #6 on a few teams in the league. A #7 on some. Not in the picture on several. His interview with Melnyk was absolutely priceless.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad