Confirmed with Link: Canucks sign UFA D Cam Barker to 1-Year, $700K Deal

Kmode

Registered User
Nov 3, 2006
809
6
Canucks sign Cam Barker

As per Pierre Lebrun.

1 year, $700,000 pro-rated.

Pierre LeBrun‏@Real_ESPNLeBrun

Hearing Canucks have agreed to terms on one year, $700 K pro-rated deal with d-man Cam Barker. I like that signing.
 

Kmode

Registered User
Nov 3, 2006
809
6
See ya later Keith Ballard?

Barker is essentially the exact same player, but about 4 mill cheaper.

Barker will give fans fits every night.
 

Dado

Guest
Never liked him much. But he's cheap enough to bury, so low risk, and worth taking a shot.
 

Barney Gumble

Registered User
Jan 2, 2007
22,711
1
Bad move - I wouldn't have given him even a PTO contract. Hope I'm proven wrong.

Never liked him much. But he's cheap enough to bury, so low risk, and worth taking a shot.
I thought you can't shove guys in the minors to remove the cap hit anymore?
 

Drop the Sopel

Registered User
May 4, 2007
18,325
59
calgary
Horrible deal. Why's the point of signing him when we have Connauton?

Because Connauton isn't very good. Besides, if Connauton outplays Barker you just send Barker down to the AHL. The Wolves defense isn't that strong from what I've seen, and it'll be losing it's #1 in Tanev.
 

shortshorts

Registered User
Oct 29, 2008
12,637
99
Likelyhood we see him is very low. He's where Sulzer was in the line-up last year.

Unless AV has some weird obsession to fill with Rome gone.
 

thefeebster

Registered User
Mar 13, 2009
7,183
1,646
Vancouver
I know its a petty signing, but i was just yelling "OMG NO F&*^ NO, WHAT THE F ARE YOU DOING?"

I simply do not understand.
 

luongo321

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
12,247
33
Likelyhood we see him is very low. He's where Sulzer was in the line-up last year.

Unless AV has some weird obsession to fill with Rome gone.

I liked Sulzer. :( Still can't believe we traded him for MAG. Great asset management MG. :shakehead

Didn't Barker get cut from an AHL team this season? Did he show some glimpse of something that caught MG's eye? i've barely seen him play, but pretty much EVERYONE seems to be against him.
 

GJB

Dr. Hook
Sponsor
Aug 12, 2002
2,085
627
Would much rather have an Aaron Rome type d-man than Barker....
 

Mcnofool6110

Re-defining Rock Bottom since '07
Dec 7, 2011
10,167
4,225
Sydney
Here's where you ask yourself: As a team in the Northwest Division that saw Cam Barker play for the Oilers last season, how on this green earth does Vancouver pick him up?!
 

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
187,086
20,532
Chicagoland
See ya later Keith Ballard?

Barker is essentially the exact same player, but about 4 mill cheaper.

Barker will give fans fits every night.

Ballard at his worst is still alot better then Cam Barker

I honestly dont understand how Barker keeps getting work in NHL at this point
 

Barney Gumble

Registered User
Jan 2, 2007
22,711
1
Because Connauton isn't very good. Besides, if Connauton outplays Barker you just send Barker down to the AHL. The Wolves defense isn't that strong from what I've seen, and it'll be losing it's #1 in Tanev.

I'd think Corrado is ahead of Connauton right now; I'd I really wonder if Barker is better than Corrado even at this early point in this career.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad