The contract slides until he makes the team. He can play 9 or fewer games with the Canucks next season without burning a year.What does this mean? He can't play in Utica right?
The contract slides until he makes the team. He can play 9 or fewer games with the Canucks next season without burning a year.
What does this mean? He can't play in Utica right?
That's awesome. The kid has an impressive skillset, but the most impressive thing I've seen is his compete level. On and off the ice, it looks like he's got a drive in him. And that's the most crucial thing for prospects imo. He's got everything it takes to be an NHLer for many years, I'm happy he's signed with us.
His ELC won't kick in until next season if he plays a game.
The Warriors are going to the playoffs but aren't favourites to go far. He could end up in Utica this season if he signs an ATO after the Warriors are eliminated and Utica is still playing.
Yes, sorry I didn't specifyIf he plays more than 9 games in the NHL next year, then yep—otherwise it slides as he'll be a 19 year old
I'm trying to do the same with "impactful," we could team up.I echo these thoughts, though I'd like to start a campaign to substitute the good English word "competitiveness" for the hockey jargon phrases "his compete" and "his compete level." But it'd probably be a campaign of one.
Maybe Brent Sopel?Have the Canucks ever drafted a true top pairing d-man from the WHL?....Garth Butcher, who I believe played in Regina was a high pick, but really not a top-four guy. Woo might break the Canucks WHL slump.
And I suppose if they were to draft Byram, would they have two members of a future 'top-four' pairing? I defer to posters who watch the WHL far more than I do.