Nah. Dzingel isn’t very good and isn’t much of a C. I prefer Sutter who actually knows how to play a 4th line C role
Absolutely. How are the two even "comparables"?
Dzingel is basically a "top-6 or bust" winger, who is mostly a bust even in that desired role. When he's "on" and in a Top-6 role and zooming around actually scoring a bit, he can be a far more "exciting" player to watch than Sutter. But those instances are pretty sporadic, and mostly Ottawa-centric for some reason. And he would
not be getting any semblance of Top-6 ice here.
Whereas Sutter is pretty much exactly what you realistically want in a Bottom-6 "role player" specialist. He's much more capable as a Center, especially as a faceoff ace. He can play more limited defensive minutes with other offensively challenged and raw skill deficient linemates, and not really have it affect his productivity much. Plus, he's still a good PKer. Add to that the "intangibles" and his known fit and likeability in this specific locker room and coaching staff, etc. and it's hard to ask for anything more in a depth player for just over a million bucks.
If we didn't have Pearson and/or Podkolzin penciled in to "Top-9 Winger" type roles, sure...take a flyer on Dzingel maybe. But for the situation we actually have, Sutter is the actually appropriate fit. Dzingel is just a random non-comparable player on a similar contract.