VERY good chance that both Hughes brothers will be in the running for Calder next year.
Lets just hope it's for the same team.
Lets just hope it's for the same team.
I don't see Jack in the running for Calder. He's not going to be able to keep up to more developed rookies coming into the league next year like Cody Glass. Even Kakko is more ready than Hughes right now.VERY good chance that both Hughes brothers will be in the running for Calder next year.
Lets just hope it's for the same team.
LA should have blown us out early but had zero finish. The long struggles in the playoffs, etc... seems to have drained away any offensive talent their forwards once had. Canucks did well thru the latter part of the second and in the third and ultimately were, by OT, the better team.
Good etc...
Agree with most of what you said. If I were to look at Pearson and Leivo with the view that I'm not sure they should carry both for much longer, Pearson is doing the better job. I don't think either should be in the top 6 but I'm more comfortable with Pearson in that slot. I guess I'm just not seeing what some see in Leivo. I'm seeing what Babcock saw.
For his acquisition price, Leivo has done a solid job and scored at a decent rate. I don’t know if he’s a long term solution for this team (I lean towards “he’s not”), but I’d bring him back on another 1 year, one-way deal to compete for a spot in camp. When he’s on, he’s good along the boards, has some good moves and a good shot. When he’s off, he blends into the woodwork a bit and gets to chasing the play in all three zones.
I don't disagree...of course that's pretty much the Babcock assessment!
Looks like i outliked you and you're defence of NHL referee's . You did get one like from Peen though , doesn't really count.Yeah, it's pretty ****ing impressive that you have to pull **** up from a decade ago to make your point.
Like to see Horvat get the 'C' and Boeser the 'A' moving ahead.
Re-watched parts. Demko generally more solid but both those goals were not good at all. First one no reason to be sliding there - no attacker to worry about a pass to. That's what we call "Slide happy". Second one just an extremely poor track, looks like it basically went straight through on his blocker side well within reach. Not a laser either.
VERY good chance that both Hughes brothers will be in the running for Calder next year.
Lets just hope it's for the same team.
Lmfao.
Is like 1% a very good chance?
I said this in the GDT.Was it me, or did the other Canucks D take a page from Quinn's book and start passing the puck harder (not only giving the receiver a chance to get it before someone is on him, but also makes it flutter less and can be easier to receive), particularly D to D on the offensive blue line?
Also, Schenn. Really liked his game last night. Here is what I saw - a guy who knew what his job was. Not to win the game. His job was to make Quinn's first NHL game go as smooth and good as possible - protect him from crap, cover for him on rushes, be available at all times for a pass to relieve pressure at the back end. Going to post this in one of the Schenn threads.
Boeser and Pettersson need their own forward version of Schenn. Nothing against Leivo, but he ain't it. I like Goldy, but he ain't it. A young Burrows, not sure where you find one.
I thought Spooner was pretty solid. I think a little more of Hutton. First game back after an injury, so I cut a little slack. I will continue my ongoing rant that Virtanen should be tried with Petterson. I see a huge upside for Virtanen and possibly even a small upside for Pettersen due to Jake's speed and toughness. Hell, Petey has got enough game smarts for two players. Cannot understand why Green has not tried this. And, yeah, I could be way wrong, but how about seeing how it works out.LA should have blown us out early but had zero finish. The long struggles in the playoffs, etc... seems to have drained away any offensive talent their forwards once had. Canucks did well thru the latter part of the second and in the third and ultimately were, by OT, the better team.
Good
Hughes - lot to like. Quick and smart with the puck and has head up all the time. Something you'd like others like Hutton to have a little more of. Passing, I thought, was excellent - real nice touch. Some defensive problems but did seem to handle people fairly well one on one off the rush. Has outstanding first couple of strides.
Schenn - after watching him in Anaheim at the beginning of the year I didn't think we got much in the trade but maybe got to re-think that. When I watched him in Utica started to warm to this player as he made such a difference to the Comet defense and began to wonder if he had some NHL game left. Since the call up has put together many good performances. Believe he will get a NHL contract next year and hopefully Canucks can keep him at a decent price. Worry might be that he will lose some of the incentive he has now, and regress, if given any kind of length in his contract.
Boeser - getting back to the form he showed last year. Different player than the player that started the year. Hopefully really gets it together in the off season. Terms for his next contract remain a bit of quandary b/c of the unevenness of his season. Been all over the map this year. His leadership is becoming evident. Like to see Horvat get the 'C' and Boeser the 'A' moving ahead.
Pearson - plays a more complete two way game than most of the forwards.
Demko - one thing to like is how he made himself big in the net. Gave up very little net in the shoot out. Be good if this season could end the season on a positive note for Demko.
Not Good
Spooner - spurts of talent but overall just doesn't jell with anyone. This season is a write off for Spooner. Whether he can ever get his game back together and become the offensive threat he once was is really open to question. Maybe if he can get the groin problems behind him and get a full training game and pre-season he can provide something next year. Don't see a buy out in his case.
Schaller - Is he getting worse??? Basic skills like giving and receiving a pass seem missing.
Granlund - mostly a no show in this one. Needs to be dumped at the earliest opportunity.
Others
Levio - does not have a consistent game. Makes the good play here and there but total non factor on too many shifts
Virtanen - better in this game. But this game had little structure and in that environment Virtanen is more at home.
Hutton - think it is becoming real obvious that Stecher is better than Hutton. Hutton is very marginal top 4 player and there is no way he is top 4 on a top end NHL defense. Quickness is just not there.
I wonder if he is trade bait for getting more drafts.
Gaudette - best game in a while. Had more control in this game and was staying in the play better. Looking ahead Gaudette is going to have define his game better. Is he a good offensive player who can produce offense??? Is he a good defensive player who can force the play in every zone??? Don't think he is either of those right now.
Pettersson one of his better game over the last stretch. Maybe getting a second wind.
See Baertschi was sat. He has been miserable since his return and you have to have qualms about his future. You start penciling in next year's lineup and you have to question where he fits in.
When you look at the team that the Canucks seem to be putting together you think they would be better off if the NHL just went to 4 on 4 hockey.
Melvin, you are an expert at finding fault with minor sh*t. The Canucks have a 6% chance currently and Benning is probably motivated to try and do something special since the draft is in Vancouver, which is more likely his point. (Horvat and our first pick for the first pick overall?) I am tempted to fly from Oz to watch the draft.Lmfao.
Is like 1% a very good chance?