He was playing against rookies and fringe players, he really isn't an NHL player at all. Not yet anyways.
- Skinner has a NMC. Not even sure he would of accepted a trade to Montreal
- Duclair turned us down. I remember reading about this.
- Perron and Sheary... Don't care.
- We were not getting Domi without using Galchenyuk. We can hope there was another deal but who? Coyotes were not trading Domi for a package return. Yeah, he was not trending well but that don't mean the Coyotes were trading him for cheap or not getting a serious return for him.
I'm not overly upset we lost DLR. After all, he is a bottom 6 talent. However, I rather we didn't lose him. I see him being a very good piece in the bottom 6. With me it was easy, just send Alzner down and go with 6 D while we played lots of home games and the road games were close to Montreal. Laval is close.
-Skinner is Canadian, I doubt he'd rather play in Buffalo than Montreal.
- had read Duclair never got an offer from us.
-you prefer DLR to Perron of Sheary?
-I think we could have got Domi for a package including Poehling, early 2nd, and a roster player such as Lehkonen, Shaw, Armia, Scherbak, etc..
Yes, 4th line with Deslauriers and Hudon.Is Chaput playing tonight?
Yep and now we are seeing why he has been a career minor leaguer, he brings nothingIf we're going to be fair, DLR wasn't able to stand out against those same rookies and fringe players.
Peca's definitely dropped compared to what he was showing at camp and even the start of the year.
But...
If we're looking at production, Peca has played 87 less NHL games than DLR and only has 8 less points.
If we're looking at age, Peca is only two years older. Nothing really major in difference when Peca is only 25.
If we're looking at salary, Peca only makes $200K more than DLR. That is peanuts for a team with $11M in cap space.
I like DLR and also pictured him as Habs' 4C. But unfortunately for him, when the teams are supposed to make these decisions at camp and early in the season, Peca outplayed DLR.
-Skinner is Canadian, I doubt he'd rather play in Buffalo than Montreal.
- had read Duclair never got an offer from us.
-you prefer DLR to Perron of Sheary?
-I think we could have got Domi for a package including Poehling, early 2nd, and a roster player such as Lehkonen, Shaw, Armia, Scherbak, etc..
Before the season started this team was rebuilding/tanking/retooling etc... The habs weren't in a position to trade for all these players. Duclair would of been a good player to take a flyer on but Perron/Sheary/Skinner was not the direction this team was going in.
If the habs were 5-16 would you still be saying the same thing? The record and position we are in is a total surprise we were supposed to be where St Louis or the Pens are.
I was saying the same thing before the season that's why I mention it.
Skinner for a 2nd was a steal. Even if you don't resign him, chances are he fetches at least a 1st at the deadline, is what I said then. Now, he's on pace to get 2 1sts! I'm livid we didn't get him.
Duclair, Perron, and Sheary were all available for free!!!!!!!!!! (a 4th for Sheary is pretty much free)
Much rather Chaput that having Froese up here again, also glad they didn't do something stupid and call up Evans after a few good games.
Yep and now we are seeing why he has been a career minor leaguer, he brings nothing
I am more concerned by our D-Corp play than by a 4th line play.
Fair point but Peca is too small to be on a so called gritty and grinding 4th line. DLR was built for that assignmentEh. In his much shorter NHL stint to date, Peca's done nearly as much as DLR. And defensively, DLR wasn't all that great either. There were a lot of chances against when he was on the ice (Marc Dumont likes to point to advanced stats to explain his statement) and I remember him saying this in one of his TSN690 segments.
I am more concerned by our D-Corp play than by a 4th line play.
- Skinner is an Ontario boy. I doubt he chooses Montreal where he waives his NMC
- Not 100% sure. I recall Duclair turning us down. I think the offer we gave him was a two way deal which was an issue with him.
- No, I don't want Perron or Sheary to take up our cap space where we are already loaded up front and something has to give. I don't want anything to do with any moves that helps our middle of the pack strategy. Perron and Sheary are depth moves. Not interested in them taking up cap space where we have many young players knocking on the door.
- Domi for Poehling, 2nd and a roster player? Come on man! If you say no to ROR in a futures price, you say no to Domi as well. The only issue I had with Domi for Galchenyuk was we should of got a 2nd or 3rd on top of Domi in return. At this stage, I'm only listening to trading Poehling if we get a stud in return who plays LD.
Ah so we could have gotten Domi without trading Galchenyuk in your view.
With the package I proposed, I was trying to illustrate, without a doubt, that we could have gotten Domi without trading Galchenyuk. I would take Galchenyuk over Poehling. I still think our biggest weakness as we build the team, will be high end offensive talent. Timmins will draft the top 4 d. Bergevin will eventually find the bottom pair d. Weber, Petry, Juulsen, Mete, and Reilly is a nice base that will be added to by the likes of Brook, Fleury, Romanov, and Timmins' future picks. KK, Domi, and Danault will be enough at C, but we'll probably add one more to them. High end offensive talent is hardest for us to find. It's a shame we missed out on Skinner and Duclair - and Peron - who were available this summer.
Of course if Poehling turns out to be an offensive machine, I'd take him over Galchenyuk. And, really, I choose between the two after askingTimmins to give me a deep and thorough projection of Poehling. If he's not reasonably confident Poehling will be more than a 40-45 point offensive player, I take Galchneyuk, who I project to be a 60-70 point player, minimum in the new NHL. Galchenyuk was top 10 in the league playing with Raduov. I think he could do the same or close to it with Domi or Kotkaniemi as his center.
Well, yeah anything is possible if everybody is on the table. Habs have a lot to offer at this stage. However, Domi was not being traded for futures IMO and it comes down to circumstance between the two teams.
Yeah, I would of preferred to acquire Domi without using Galchenyuk. But not at a Poehling+ price. I said no to ROR, so why would we have done this for Domi? Cause we could of predicted the future and we know he would be doing what he is currently doing? Come on man
DLR was the perfect 4th line center...a real idiotic move to lose him for nothing
Why not Hudon back on the 3rd, and Kenny-Peca-Chaput line?