A bogus court challenge that many lawyers have deemed valid and destined to win? I am no lawyer but I will certainly take the word of experts (kind of the same way we have been with medical experts). Your opinion seems to be emotionally charged and your comparison of road LAWS are so far fetched it's hard to no where to start. There is no law mandating stay at home orders, limits to inter-provincial travel and other various things people believe we should be following. The power is in the hands of the individual, meanwhile roads are patrolled by law enforcement, why? because its the law. Again this has no debate about who is right or wrong, but downgrading its validity just serves you to look close minded and as far gone as the other side of the spectrum.
My argument isn't emotional.
There is a legitimate challenge about whether the Feds or the Province have the ability to set health policy and whether the Quarantine Act applies to "self isolation." Those types of constitutional challenges are not bogus and help establish the framework for the democracy.
We can find legal scholars on both sides.
However, that's not what I read into your post.
It sounded more like discourse around the concept of "you can't boss me around." I have a right to go where I want, not wear a mask, and all that other type of BS.
In those cases, a driving example is an excellent illustrator. I guess we could argue we can drive wherever we want. But we don't have that "right."
We relinquish that "right" when we drive and consent to being bound by laws that protect the common good.
In COVID times, we have requirements for people to distance. Requiring businesses to operate within the bounds of evidence based health practices that the Provinces/Feds have enacted in order to protect the common good is the same context.
You cannot operate a business safely without distancing and sanitation measures in place. If you cannot... or choose not to... you cannot operate.
It's that simple.
If you cannot go to a park without distancing yourself... you are subject to fine and/or imprisonment as established in the Quarantine Act.
People can choose to be jackwads but they don't have an unequivocal "right" to put other people at risk.