No chance I would give Crawford 2 years on a 35+ contractMuch rather have Crawford's deal at 2 years...
But what's done is done...
I'd rather have that than 3 years that brings Talbot to the same age.No chance I would give Crawford 2 years on a 35+ contract
I'd rather have that than 3 years that brings Talbot to the same age.
But I'd wish for once GMs got creative. 1 year deals on 35+ contracts can have bonuses and we have tons of caproom. Probably could have got Crawford at 1 year with 3.5 guaranteed, an additional 1 m each for 30 games started, .915 save percentage and like 15 wins.
If he does all those things he's worth the 6.5 mil
Edit: 15 wins is too little, 20 wins
Why in the world would you pay Crawford $6.5M for being an average goaltender?I'd rather have that than 3 years that brings Talbot to the same age.
But I'd wish for once GMs got creative. 1 year deals on 35+ contracts can have bonuses and we have tons of caproom. Probably could have got Crawford at 1 year with 3.5 guaranteed, an additional 1 m each for 30 games started, .915 save percentage and like 15 wins.
If he does all those things he's worth the 6.5 mil
Edit: 15 wins is too little, 20 wins
Either. If you have the cap space(which we currently do) they count for this year. But they can roll over if need be like ELC bonuses.Would the bonuses count for this year or next year?
Either. If you have the cap space(which we currently do) they count for this year. But they can roll over if need be like ELC bonuses.
Only time I can remember a GM taken advantage of this rule is Boston with Iginla. With him the two years he was there the bonuses rolled over.
It's paying him for atleast being an average goaltender. It's getting a goaltender who has always been great when healthy, and paying him for being healthy, without adding a long term commitment.Why in the world would you pay Crawford $6.5M for being an average goaltender?
We have 40 m next year in cap space, and the base is less than Talbot with only greenway to sign and 4 mil left. and Kaprizov is the only other player eligable for bonuses.We don’t have $3M this year and rolling them would be incredibly risky.
I like the thought of a 1 year deal with incentives, it's just that your numbers were way off. Alex Stalock would have made $5.5M last year under that contract.It's paying him for atleast being an average goaltender. It's getting a goaltender who has always been great when healthy, and paying him for being healthy, without adding a long term commitment.
You could get fancier. Break the 1 millions down. 500k for 15 wins and additional 500k for 25. 500k for 500k for .910 an additional 500k for .920, etc.
Offer him a good guarantee, and a chance to make great money for being great by sacrificing term.
I'm a number of beers deep, so it was more of a generality of the idea.I like the thought of a 1 year deal with incentives, it's just that your numbers were way off. Alex Stalock would have made $5.5M last year under that contract.
Folks I think we might be missing the boat here on Kahkonen. On Russo’s podcast he had Scott Wheeler on and he talked about KK. He said he projects as a #2 not a number 1 as do most scouts when asked. Could it be also that GMBG and staff think the same. Maybe Talbot getting the 3rd year is really more for Jones than KK.
Folks I think we might be missing the boat here on Kahkonen. On Russo’s podcast he had Scott Wheeler on and he talked about KK. He said he projects as a #2 not a number 1 as do most scouts when asked. Could it be also that GMBG and staff think the same. Maybe Talbot getting the 3rd year is really more for Jones than KK.
Wheeler also said in that same podcast he doesn’t like Jones NHL potential very much.
I think KK can be a number 1 in this league. Seems like he’s done well everywhere he’s been. Who really knows though. Did people see Khudobin and Kuemper becoming what they are now?
The Ghost of Zholtok back in Minnesota to play in goal
Best value. I’d rather have added Pietrangelo, but Talbot was a good diamond in the rough to unearth, and I don’t think people are giving him enough credit for the season he’s having. Yeah, we knew he would be good in our system based on the amount of high-danger chances we give up relative to other teams, but we haven’t made it as easy on him as we made it on goalies in the last. Dubnyk let in a over a goal above expected per game last year, the worst statistical season in that regard we had seen since the statistic was developed. Talbot, on the other hand, is actually one of the best goalies in the league in terms of goals saved above expected this season.Best UFA signing of last off season? Maybe I'm spacing on a couple, but I can't think of any off the top of my head.