GloryDaze4877
Barely Irrelevant
I fully agree that they were hoping to add a big FA during the off-season and it didn't pan out, which was a setback.
I couldn't see what you bolded for some reason....guessing it's about relying on the youth. Which I'll expand upon here.
First, once the FA's didn't pan out, my fear is that Sweeney was too reluctant to move prospects to get more established veterans when they had good value. Off the top of my head O'Reilly and Spooner would have been good targets. No idea what the asking price for either would have been, as every GM has guys he likes or dislikes more than others.
Second, I've always been frustrated with the fact that they have drafted so many similar forwards over the past few years, and while there are always nuances between players; Bjork, Donato, JFK, Heinen, even DeBrusk, who is the best of the bunch....are all very similar, with little physicality to offer. I'm not even going to lament skipping on Barzal or Connor, because I know teams miss, but without delving into every draft of the last 5 years, I just get frustrated that they don't seem to value big and physical forwards as much as smaller, less physical ones.
Now, I could be off base and look further into it to find that there wasn't anyone available that fit that description around their picks, but they seem to reach for guys anyways, at times (Zboril, Senyshyn). To me, when you make a reach, it should be for someone who is smallish, but tremendously skilled....like a Barzal/Gaudreau or big and physical that maybe hasn't fully developed their offense. Maybe a third category is reaching for a good leader --- of course they did that with Mark Stuart and while he was a solid player, he wasn't Parise.
Lastly, I guess of all the points I've made, the biggest issue I have is that he seems too reluctant to move the young guys. Maybe he's gun shy because of Seguin, but do we want a gun shy GM? I know don't.
There are always deals to be made IMO. You target a guy or three that can help and do what it takes to get them. If they are truly too expensive to get according to your management team, you move on to the next one.
There's a draft every year and a chance to get the next Pasta, Donato, Bjork, etc. Stockpiling all of these kids is really only good to a point. I cannot envision a successful Bruins team that has Bjork, Donato, Heinen and JFK all playing major roles. Last year I felt the same way, but it was only because I thought they were all too small and not physical enough. Sadly, this year it's that and that I wonder if 1 or 2 aren't even good enough to play in the NHL long term, which is troubling because at least last year they had trade value...now I'm not so sure.
In the end, maybe I'll be proven wrong...but most of us have been around here long enough to have seen the Cam Stewarts, Ivan Huml's, Ryan Spooner's and Cameron Mann's of the world flop....is it really that much of a stretch to think it could happen to these guys?
The part I bolded was this:
"they're now in a position where they may need to make moves they don't want to in order to improve....or even get to the point they hoped to be."
I already addressed this in my previous post. IMO, the B's process: try to sign a Top 6 FA, hope it could be filled internally, come to the realization a trade needs to be made is one that many organizations would have chosen. I don't think the put themselves in an unusual position in any way.
As far as the new bolded parts go (hopefully you can see these)...I like ROR a lot, but he cost a boatload and the B's had 37 and 46 heading into the year, so I think they would have been more interested in a wing. They supposedly had interest in Tavares, so I guess they could have done the same thing (from a positional standpoint) with ROR they were planning on doing with JT? Difference was that Tavares only cost money. Did you really say Spooner or did you mean "Skinner"?
I think in 2015, their top priority was to find some big, fast scoring wingers, and they felt they were in decent shape at center, hence the DeBrusk and Senyshyn picks.
I keep seeing people say this (presumably because Chabot has hit the NHL quicker), but Zboril was not much of a reach, if any at all. I believe the B's wanted one of the Big 3 D that year (Hanifin, Provorov, Werenski), and weren't able to get one. They really needed a D and there was a dropoff after those guys, but Zboril was very much in the mix of the next group of D.
Here's a link to the consensus rankings for 2015, which takes 7 sources and averages where those scouts have them:
2015 NHL Draft Prospect Consensus Rankings
Chabot and Zboril were 18 and 21 respectively, and Zboril was rated above Chabot in the 14-18 range by a couple of people.
Last edited: