God Bless Canada
Registered User
There is no big picture on Bure. He scored goals. That's about it. No consistent physical or defensive play. No praise for his off-ice conduct, leadership or commitment to the team. Only one playoff (1995) where you sat back and said "Geez, he really took his play to the next level compared with what we saw in the regular season." (Yes, he put up points in 1994, but only in the Dallas series was he a consistent force on a game-by-game basis).StickMang said:I have been a long time lurker, and rarely post. Yet I came out of radio silence to post simply out of amazement at these results. This is absolutely no discredit to Bure, who has phenomenal numbers, incredible skill, and national exposure as one of the "most skilled hockey stars". However, Cam Neely was simply a better hockey player ito this Bruins "homer".
He was a clutch performer in games and in the playoffs, a game changing player with his physical presence and his scoring ability. He helped define, or at least portrayed perfectly the term, "power forward". His intensity and intimidation affected the play around him. He was the quintissential body checker and pugilist extraordinaire, whose fists carried reputation amongst even goonery, such that he didn't have to fight to win the edge. His leadership appeared to be the demonstrable, tenacious type, which seemed to complement Ray's subtlety.
Cam's skills were as great as his physical tools. He had enough touch to pass well, and he had excellent backhand and forehand shots; Cam had the ability to score from all over the ice. While his slapper was intense, his snap shot was so good that it would have been in the Johhny Peirson Top 3. While I wouldn't characterize him as fast, he had an incredibly powerful stride and the strength and leverage to obtain body position at full stride; some of his goals were strangely acrobatic for a big player. Cam was the definitive anchor in front of the net at even strength and on power play.
His determination to come back after so many injuries, and playing in pain, was a testament to his character. I think most amazing is his personal determination to overcome all of the difficulties with illness and death in his family. And to engender such altruistic endeavors as an ambassador to with charitable events, and of course, starting his own foundation, are simply amazing feats of a giving, caring person. He truly conveyed a bond with the hard-working purveyors of his craft, emulating them, endearing them, and thereby honoring them; we returned the same to him.
Maybe in my Bostonian myopia, I am missing the full picture on Bure; or perhaps there truly is no comparison, as I contend...
-Mang
If goals and stats are the be all and end all in someone's hockey universe, without any regard for any of the other fine points that make hockey such a great game, then of course they'll pick Bure.
Someone made the point earlier that Bure put people in the seats. I'd much rather pay to watch Cam Neely bring his multi-faceted game, which included goals, then watch Bure. Again, that's personal preference, and a reflection of how subjective the word "exciting" really is.