Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't we the only ones who can sign him to an eight year deal? I thought everyone else can only go seven.
Correct. Which is advantageous, because it means you can sign a player for slightly less, because the overall contract pays more. For a player like Fowler, who we'd be signing in his prime, that can be a pretty nice advantage. Let's say 6.5 over 8 years, just as a nice neat number. That's 52 million over the length of the contract. That translates to almost 7 and a half million over 7 years. It's quite a difference.
I don't know that Murray would be interested in a contract like that, but the option is there. In theory, that puts us in a better position to re-sign him than some teams. Not all teams, but some. The exceptions to that are the team's that would be willing to open up the vault to sign him. We can't do that. Most teams can't. Some can, and might be willing to, but he would have to get to UFA status for it to be an option for them.
The numbers suggest Anaheim is in a pretty good position to re-sign him at a reasonable rate, if that is what both sides want.
Edit: The TLDR version - A team can't offer him 7.5 over 8 years. And the equivalent of that over 7 years surpasses 8.5 per year. I think that's a little bit unrealistic.
Last edited: