As for the Cam trade, I think I posted it already, but from a hockey perspective I really like it, IMO Voracek is the better hockey player. Cam has played last two seasons at 22 goal pace and I don't really think he brings enough on the table otherwise to say that his usefulness is not pretty directly related to how much goals he scores.
The discussion around Cam/Laine and whether he was the guy (or one of) who wanted Laine gone highlights to me why I have zero respect for players leaking things like that to the media. If you really want him gone, have the balls to say it out in the open. Now we have some player/players whispering things from the dark and since it's not publicly known who exactly it is, it's just throwing shade on everyone. If I was running the team, I wouldn't want guys like that in the room.
I don't think sticking with the old core was really an option for CBJ, since all the most important players of that core are gone anyway. Comparing the CBJ core to Bruins seems a bit silly, and while I don't think all 'core players' need to be the best players in the team in their position, most of them should be. In a highly competitive environment it just holds a lot more weight for others if it comes from the best. Certainly you can be a good leader even from the middle of the lineup, but I'd say it's a bit different if Patrice Bergeron tells you how things should be done than if Cam Atkinson or Boone Jenner does (just an example). No slight to Jenner or Atkinson but Bergeron has the hardware, including the Cup and many deep runs, to add some weight to his words.
What comes to Laine, I don't think Jarmo 'needs' to make Laine great, or anyone else to make Laine great, what he needs is a Laine who gets back to his level and some players around him who can make some use of those talents. Last season Laine was on pace for 21 goals, which is by far the worst pace of his career this far. He scored 30-44 goals pre covid per season and in his last covid shortened full season as a Jet he was on pace for 34/82. CBJ simply needs Laine not underperforming, they don't need to turn him into anything he already isn't / hasn't been. Laine isn't a 'playdriver' but when he's anywhere near his best he isn't a passenger either, 16-17, 17-18 or 19-20 he wasn't a passenger 5v5 on his lines. But when he is struggling he digs himself a very deep hole, latter part of 18-19 and 20-21 were good examples of that, he was so deep in he was dragging others down with him. That's something he needs to sort out, even when you suck you should be able to maintain some kind of baseline of performance. In any case Laine is young enough he could still be at the height of his prime when some of these recents picks make their impact on very favourable ELC contracts.
I think from this trade alone it's clear full on tanking isn't in the plans, I think the idea is to stay as competitive as possible and then when you get those guys on ELCs making an impact, go all in. I think it's a good plan, I hate tanking.