It is inappropriate to raise racial issues in a non-racial situation. It infers bigotry on your part.Damn millennial SJW soyboys and their
...
efforts to ensure people face repercussions for their actions.
it’s hilarious how this stuff suddenly is “going to far” now that straight white guys are getting caught up in it.
On ice behaviour does not diminish his credibility as a witness.Who is trying to silence Carrillo? I personally won’t listen to his shit because he comes across as someone crying out for attention on a regular basis, often without anyone else backing up his claims.
Crying wolf comes to mind.
Add to that the fact that he was a dirty POS during his playing days, he comes across as a huge hypocrite.
I listen to people I respect, that’s pretty much the way the world works.
The one thing we have learned from the discussion of concussions is that witnesses do not come forward.If these things were true there would be plenty of witnesses.
If what Carcillo said is not corroborated then it is not credible and is not worthy of belief.
The way these things usually evolve is that witnesses come forward once others already have. Carcillo may have been an on-ice "dirt bag" but I am not aware of anything in his past which would cause one to question his candour. Also, the Los Angeles Kings locked Sutter out of their locker room.So believe the one guy who says something bad who is a complete dirt bag while ignoring the rest of the people who have nothing but good things to say about him?
What about dressing room behaviour? Does being an A-hole off the ice diminish his credibility?On ice behaviour does not diminish his credibility as a witness.
Carcillo never has and never will have any credibility.What about dressing room behaviour? Does being an A-hole off the ice diminish his credibility?
What about the fact the Carcillo has/had serious substance abuse issues so his memory of events that happened 6 years before he made the accusations, may be some what iffy? Does that diminish his credibility?
What about the fact that Carcillo seems to have an axe to grind with the Sutter family? Does that diminish his credibility?
What about the fact that not a single person has come forward to corroborate his accusations, which were made almost a year and a half ago btw? Does that diminish his credibility?
What about Carcillo being an attention whore and lots of people wouldn't trust him as far they could throw him? Does that diminish his credibility?
It is inappropriate to raise racial issues in a non-racial situation. It infers bigotry on your part.
Carcillo did bring it up again. They asked him about it and he said Darryl is a bad human and he hasn't changed.I wouldn't go so far as to call this a case of cancel culture. This re-surfaced because a reporter asked Sutter about it, not because Carcillo brought it up again. If he had brought it up again since the hiring, that might've been different. Since he didn't, though, this whole discussion of cancel culture seems a little out of place and distracting. We should be discussing the merits of the accusation and its credibility without tarnishing the good name of cancel culture by associating Carcillo with it.
I wouldn't go so far as to call this a case of cancel culture. This re-surfaced because a reporter asked Sutter about it, not because Carcillo brought it up again. If he had brought it up again since the hiring, that might've been different. Since he didn't, though, this whole discussion of cancel culture seems a little out of place and distracting. We should be discussing the merits of the accusation and its credibility without tarnishing the good name of cancel culture by associating Carcillo with it.
Carcillo made the comments about Sutter being a bad human being who hasn't changed yesterday.Nah dude, this is just a symptom of the "woke SJW mob" out of control. How dare you illustrate that these comments were made in 2019, and not recently as some kind of attempt to "cancel" Sutter. People are just snowflakes these days. Why can't I offend with impunity like I used to!
Carcillo made the comments about Sutter being a bad human being who hasn't changed yesterday.
They asked Carcillo about the comments and the quote about him bring a bad human being who hasn't gone through a process to change was his repsnse yesterday.Where, in the link provided in the OP, does it state this? The allegations and accusations of abuse being discussed in this thread were made in 2019, not yesterday.
They asked Carcillo about the comments and the quote about him bring a bad human being who hasn't gone through a process to change was his repsnse yesterday.
Help please.Yes, and the allegations and accusations of abuse, those which people are associating with "cancel culture", were made in 2019.
Help please.
So Carcillo made these same accusations of abusiveness by Sutter back in 2019?
According to Carcillo:Yes, the initial allegations, as per the article, were made in 2019. When Sutter did his presser, he was asked to clarify, and I'm assuming they asked Carillo to clarify as well, but the article doesn't make that clear.
According to Carcillo:
abusive coach in 2013?
Accusations made in 2019?
Reporter asks Sutter about this yesterday?
Did Sutter answer to these accusations in 2019?