Soundwave
Registered User
- Mar 1, 2007
- 72,159
- 27,860
Go check the last time a forward picked first overall didn't play the following year in the NHL. It's been decades. And you can't possibly think Hall needed more junior experience. He was as NHL ready as any prospect has ever been. The only argument to be made can be RNH but he was playing great and leading the team in scoring at the 9 game mark his rookie season. Eberle had 2 extra years of juniors after his draft year, how much more did he need??
Just wanna add that its funny how people say a prospects development has never been hurt by keeping him out of the NHL. How do we know? Look up any prospect that didn't meet expectations and see how long it took him to play in the NHL. Maybe if he was in the NHL earlier he would have panned out, right? Who knows.
Yeah to be honest it's a double standard. The Flames couldn't possibly send Monahan back after he was leading the team in points after 9 games, but RNH did the same thing and was scoring at an even higher clip I believe, lol.
So many forwards drafted in the top 7-8 get to play their draft year, singling the Oilers out for it is silly.
The reason the Oilers are bad is because their defence has been brutal the last few years, though this season it looks somewhat decent/average at least and Scrivens/Fasth IMO is a fair upgrade in net over the gong show of Dubnyk/Labarbera. That and they haven't had enough big physical utility players to surround the younger players with ... I know people criticized the Pouliot deal, but he's brought in to be one of those bigger bodies.
Hall/RNH/Eberle/Schultz aren't the problem with the Oilers, they all contribute, it's that they have very little else on the roster that's any good. Yakupov had an off-year, that they will have to correct.