C Alex Newhook - Victoria Grizzlies, BCHL (2019, 16th, COL)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lemonlimey

Registered User
Apr 1, 2014
2,129
1,463
Crestone
hopefully avs learned with makar and jost a second college season is key. newhook could be a 70 point player dont ruin that by rushing
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,504
10,293
Newhook is the superior offensive player in all regards, but there are other ways to win games that Krebs does a lot better - that's the point I was trying to make. In regards to playmaking, I do think they are fairly close. Krebs was PPG player on one of the worst teams in the CHL and his playmaking/vision was at the core of this strength, that speaks volume to me. Newhook is damn good, but he tends to use his shot more where Krebs would pass the puck. Here Newhook is the more dangerous player since he can either pass the puck or shoot it to damage you, where with Krebs you know he'll tend to pass it before thinking shot. That trait reduces his dangerous factor, but I still he's better on even strength in generating offence while Newhook is more of the PP specialist

Both are great players and I wish the Canucks could have somehow gotten a second first rounder to nab one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lemonlimey

Patagonia

Keep Whining
Jan 6, 2017
7,624
3,246
Both are great players and I wish the Canucks could have somehow gotten a second first rounder to nab one of them.

VAN could have swapped with the AVs for a 1st next year in a package for Barrie. Instead the pick went to TB - JT Miller. So the opportunity was available, but offered a rumoured underwhelming Virtanen + Conditional 2020 1st. Podkolzin is expected to be a very good player when he eventually arrives, you should be pleased with the pick.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,504
10,293
Virtanen wasnt a reach but yea.

sure he was over the next 2 forwards picked who had much better skillsets but had "size" concerns.

Jake had a good goal total but for a guy his size his playoffs was meh and his overall hockey IQ just has never been there.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,504
10,293
VAN could have swapped with the AVs for a 1st next year in a package for Barrie. Instead the pick went to TB - JT Miller. So the opportunity was available, but offered a rumoured underwhelming Virtanen + Conditional 2020 1st. Podkolzin is expected to be a very good player when he eventually arrives, you should be pleased with the pick.

I'm not sure what the offer was that the Avs were looking for Barrie from the Canucks.

I heard they offered Virtanen and or Tanev plus some kind of draft pick but who knows.

I'm sure if the Avs 16th and Barrie were being offered to the Canucks it would have been too steep for them.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,504
10,293
Pod, Petterson, Horvat and Boeser is a pretty sweet forward core either way. Alot of variation there in their styles which should make them very versatile and mesh well.

Sure it's a decent core but the 2 previous drafts before Horvat turned out Hutton and Guance and that was it.

There also won't be another first rounder either next year or in 21 due to the JT Miller overpayment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: avsfan09

Patagonia

Keep Whining
Jan 6, 2017
7,624
3,246
I'm not sure what the offer was that the Avs were looking for Barrie from the Canucks.

I heard they offered Virtanen and or Tanev plus some kind of draft pick but who knows.

I'm sure if the Avs 16th and Barrie were being offered to the Canucks it would have been too steep for them.

This is why Benning made some odd moves.

Barrie and the 16th were both available. AVs likely targeting Horvat, so other details could have been considered including variations of picks and prospects. Basing on the AVs trade for Kadri, (similar player) AVs could have packaged: Barrie & 2019-16 (Newhook) = Horvat.

VAN could have:
  • Kept their 2020-1st & 2019-3rd picks;
  • Paid Barrie instead of overpaying Myers;
  • Solved need for RHD;
  • Barrie as a DMan vs Miller have similar scoring;
  • Drafted Newhook to replace Horvat;
  • TB would take less for Miller due to Cap issues; or
  • Sign the surplus UFA Forwards.
AVs solve their 2C and VAN adds Barrie + Newhook.
 
Last edited:

bigdog16

Registered User
Nov 7, 2013
4,351
4,274
USA
sure he was over the next 2 forwards picked who had much better skillsets but had "size" concerns.

Jake had a good goal total but for a guy his size his playoffs was meh and his overall hockey IQ just has never been there.

Wasnt a reach. He was projected to go 5-10. Sure in hindsight when you look back, but he was in the same tier as Nylander and Ehlers
 
  • Like
Reactions: ibengals

MarkusNaslund19

Registered User
Dec 28, 2005
5,457
7,766
This is why Benning made some odd moves.

Barrie and the 16th were both available. AVs likely targeting Horvat, so other details could have been considered including variations of picks and prospects. Basing on the AVs trade for Kadri, (similar player) AVs could have packaged: Barrie & 2019-16 (Newhook) = Horvat.

VAN could have:
  • Kept their 2020-1st & 2019-3rd picks;
  • Paid Barrie instead of overpaying Myers;
  • Solved need for RHD;
  • Barrie as a DMan vs Miller have similar scoring;
  • Drafted Newhook to replace Horvat;
  • TB would take less for Miller due to Cap issues; or
  • Sign the surplus UFA Forwards.
AVs solve their 2C and VAN adds Barrie + Newhook.
Canucks are not dealing Horvat. Period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast

MarkusNaslund19

Registered User
Dec 28, 2005
5,457
7,766
Didn’t believe he ever was...VAN and COL went elsewhere to fill their needs. I’m very happy for COL with the addition of Kadri and keeping their pick/Newhook.
Yup, I would absolutely love Barrie and if he signs here after next year (at a quasi-reasonable rate) I will be over the moon. But Colorado did well for themselves there.
 

Patagonia

Keep Whining
Jan 6, 2017
7,624
3,246
Yup, I would absolutely love Barrie and if he signs here after next year (at a quasi-reasonable rate) I will be over the moon. But Colorado did well for themselves there.

Barrie wants $8M+ @ 8 years.

Salary demands is about right, too high for the AVs with replacements available. I can see the Leafs keeping him due to lack of RHD.
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
28,599
23,273
East Coast
Should have went to the Q:help:
Why? NCAA is more than fine for him, and he’s getting minutes against better competition. Not every 18 year old dominates the NCAA right away, just ask his teammate drafted higher than him in Boldy.

That’s just a reactionary take.
 

16thOverallSaveUs

Danila Yurov Fan Club Executive Assistant
May 2, 2018
18,788
11,750
BC seems to be a tough place for 18yos to break in, for whatever reason. Wahlstrom last year, now Boldy and Newhook
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad