Butch's Top 130 Prospects

[CBJFan19*]

So I'm curious about a couple things.

Why Voronkov so high? How good do you think he can be? Wheres Kirill Marchenko?

 

[Big Empty]

Poehling’s a bit too high and Romanov’s too low.

 

[Shaman464]

No Mo Seider and assessing Veleno so high make this list a joke on Wings prospects.

 

[Sweetpotato]

No Mo Seider and assessing Veleno so high make this list a joke on Wings prospects.

16th on the prospect list is Seider

 

[Butch26]

Denisenko ranked top 3 by TSN is 30th? Okay

Whats your point lol

 

[Butch26]

Poehling’s a bit too high and Romanov’s too low.

Why...Because me i have Poehling at the right place , samething for Romanov

 

[Static]

No Mo Seider and assessing Veleno so high make this list a joke on Wings prospects.

Something's a joke alright.

 

[Shaman464]

Something's a joke alright.

Yep, the search function on my phone. But, still I would have Mo higher and Veleno lower.

 

[Static]

Yep, the search function on my phone. But, still I would have Mo higher and Veleno lower.

Sure, the guy puts a lot of work in though so some spots are probably pretty fluid.

 

[PlayersLtd]

I get that we are all entitled to an opinion but how people can come here and shoot things down without putting in a SIGNIFICANT effort against someone who clearly knows what the F they are talking about is as laughably HF as anything I've seen.

Dispute it all you want because this scout / coach may not be god but clearly he has made a pretty strong case for his talent analysis formula. And as we see at the draft board every year, pro scouts look at things differently. Here is a guy who is giving us insight into that and we come back with "pfff ur dumb, Mo Seider > Veleno" or compare Mark Stone's possession metrics to Drake Batherson's. Seriously?

(Bert, you did put the time into a coherent response so sorry, but I don't get your formula for disputing the Stone / Batherson comparison at all)

 

[The don godfather]

jack studnicka will be top 10 out of all this. the kids a gem.

 

[Dump and Chase Demon]

Salut Butch. Interesting list, thanks for sharing

I wondered if you had any thoughts on D Brogan Rafferty. After some modest years in Quinnipac U, he's producing at an impressive pace as a rookie in the AHL with Utica.

Leads the league in points by a def actually, nearing 0.90 p/g.

Tried to read about him on the Utica board, but not much there. It almost feels like everything is rolling for him but he's nothing so special yet, just being a good point producer in the AHL without any particular skill that shines out. Like Utica's offense is really clicking this year and he is at the right place at the right time?



Wondered

 

[danyhabsfan]

Poehling should be around 70th

 

[CheckingLineCenter]

Understand you don’t wanna rank the Q guys, but since you are inside of that league, can you offer some thoughts/opinions on Poulin?

Even if you’re biased, as a Pens fan I’m curious as to what people on the ground think of him. Thanks

 

[Alikhan Alizada]

Why...Because me i have Poehling at the right place , samething for Romanov

Im curious what do you project Poehling as and Romanov as?? Can romanov be a top pairing 2 way D? Can Poehling be a 2C?

 

[Merrrlin]

I enjoy these rankings, and I agree with you having Dobson lower than many. Well done!

 

[WetcoastOrca]

Yep, the search function on my phone. But, still I would have Mo higher and Veleno lower.

You should probably apologize to the OP for your original post then.

 

[Shaman464]

You should probably apologize to the OP for your original post then.

Nope, still a shit list.