Ok, so Karlsson outperformed Matthews before he made the nhl, and in his rookie year. Cool.
He may be a defense man, but his coach trusts him with fewer defensive zone starts than Babcock does with Matthews.
So as it stands Matthews is currently the better offensive player, and as a forward, more trusted by his coach defensively.
P/60 isn’t a what if... it just is. Every minute he spends on the ice he is far more dangerous than Burns or Karlsson.
I'm good with the arguing
It's pointless to try to argue with people who think being I hired means you're better
You look at all the excuses for Matthews, but never for the other players
Karlsson was injured and still played and still was more productive as a defensman
And your argument is "if Matthews didn't get injured and played more minutes" well none of that happened so it doesn't exist
Matthews is easily the most over rated player in the league
It doesn't matter if you were a Norris winner and scored more points
Matthews is better because potential/lpgic