Deal for Faulk has to happen, just for the LOL's when Justin Falk and Justin Faulk play together
can't give up any more scoring Reinhart has to stay Carolina takes futures 2 #1s and a prospectFaulk would be a good add for Buffalo. Reinhart would have to be headed back though.
Again, I wasn't saying whether the deal as fair or good. The only thing I was commenting on was the guy saying it was more than CGY gave in the Hamilton deal.no to Asplund , trade St Louis #1 and SJS #1 and either O"Reagan or Bailey or both.
A Justin Falk-Justin Faulk pairing would make a lot of announcers furious.
This is BS but if Reinhart is still available I’d be willing to discuss some other deal.
Trading Reinhart would be a mistake IMO.
'Falk passes it to Faulk...or was it the other way around? Oh, Falk it...?'A Justin Falk-Justin Faulk pairing would make a lot of announcers furious.
Deal for Faulk has to happen, just for the LOL's when Justin Falk and Justin Faulk play together
Nope. All of it. Nope.
Add a cap dump or 2 going to CAR and you've basically got us giving up ROR's return for Justin Faulk. C'mon man.
This is what i came to ask.Besides the ancient Flyers correct information has there been ANY rumor that has come to fruition from this source, serious question. I don't think so , therefore why anyone posts, believes or thinks it matters is beyond puzzling.
Not like that was fair value for him anyways.
Why exactly? Can teams not have 3 good forwards? I don't understand why you think they'd trade 3 of their most valuable pieces just cause they all play forwardYeah probably not for Faulk, I meant some other deal. But agreed the pieces probably aren’t there, Carolina’s probably only looking to trade Skinner and Faulk.
I’m here thinking they’ll have Eichel, Reinhart, and Mittelstadt and may want to move one out, but then I’m catching myself thinking a) being 3 centers deep like that isn’t terrible, ask Pittsburgh and b) probably need to wait a year or two to ensure they know what they’ve got before assuming they already have it.
So because we got underpaid for ROR, that makes it OK if we overpay for a meh defenseman? I'm not following you here.
I don't think it's over payment. Top 4 defenceman aren't cheap.
Why exactly? Can teams not have 3 good forwards? I don't understand why you think they'd trade 3 of their most valuable pieces just cause they all play forward
Remind me what we paid for Scandella? And, for the record, I'd take Scandella over Faulk.
Wild GM was in a crunch due to expansion draft.
It looks like the Canes GM is looking for roster players, and since we don't have any good ones to give up, it'll probably cost a little more in futures to be competitive.
If it costs less, by all means get it done, but a 26 year old RHD is a good fit for Buffalo right now and I hope it happens (even though the rumour source has no credibility).