bleedgreen
Registered User
If they’re trading him it’s because he’s been replaced by Hamilton and have TVR well slotted for the third pair. They’ve already said they have no problems keeping Faulk, but they’re trading Faulk from a position of strength not weakness. The new owner is a billionaire, and while he doesn’t throw money away he doesn’t want Waddell accepting pennies on the dollar for Faulk just because they may “get stuck” keeping him.No chance I move Risto or Reinhart for Faulk. He has just 2 years left. Reinhart and Risto have 4+ years of team control left.
And also Faulks last two years are At 6 mil per. Carolina is a budget team and is probably shopping Faulk hard to avoid paying 12 mil over the next 2 years. So that will lower his value a bit. I am not trading a high end piece for 2 years of Faulk. He makes 6 mil per in real $ and just two years before he can walk in free agency. I wouldn't offer much.
They could still trade TVR for “not much” if they felt they HAD to move one of these guys.
And one more time for the cheap seats they’re not trading for Risto or any other top 4 d. If they’re so cheap and won’t pay Faulk why would they trade for Risto? It’s the same problem only slightly cheaper. Reinhart at least makes sense, they want scoring forwards or goalies. Worst case the best futures trade they can get because Faulk’s position has already been filled.