Kocur Dill
picklicious
- Feb 7, 2010
- 3,085
- 1,587
Lemieux + Hajek
For
Pekar
?
He's not taking a top 6 spot from Hall or Reinhart. Despite Skinner's awful year this is still a guy who scored 40 goals the year before and he's got a monster salary so like it or not he's not being put on the 3rd line. Olofsson had 42 points in 54 games as a rookie so he out produced Buchnevich given he played 14 less games than him. So yeah Buchnevich very likely wouldn't be in our top 6.Are they really now claiming that Buch wouldn’t be in their top six? He had more points last year than all but two of their players.
He's not taking a top 6 spot from Hall or Reinhart. Despite Skinner's awful year this is still a guy who scored 40 goals the year before and he's got a monster salary so like it or not he's not being put on the 3rd line. Olofsson had 42 points in 54 games as a rookie so he out produced Buchnevich given he played 14 less games than him. So yeah Buchnevich very likely wouldn't be in our top 6.
Lemieux + Hajek
For
Pekar
?
The main objective for the Rangers in making a move like this would be clearing cap, so the dump coming back defeats the whole purpose.
Buffalo is going to need Cozens when Eichel inevitably leaves town in the next 1/2 years
The main objective for the Rangers in making a move like this would be clearing cap, so the dump coming back defeats the whole purpose.
Hey man I appreciate your optimism even though it's probably unfounded haha..he’s under contract. He has not stated he wants to leave. If he did- he’s still under contract. Hall should help. Thanks for being the 100 millionth poster with this same inane bullshit though.
Panarin hates you and your city and can’t wait to leave, LULZ I added to the discussion!
Lemieux + Hajek
For
Pekar
?
He's not taking a top 6 spot from Hall or Reinhart. Despite Skinner's awful year this is still a guy who scored 40 goals the year before and he's got a monster salary so like it or not he's not being put on the 3rd line. Olofsson had 42 points in 54 games as a rookie so he out produced Buchnevich given he played 14 less games than him. So yeah Buchnevich very likely wouldn't be in our top 6.
Good luck with that. There are about 2 teams in the league that still have extra cap space. (Buffalo isn't one of them...plus all the other reasons the Sabres still don't make this trade.)
Then I guess we'll just not trade DeAngelo because we would have literally no other reason to.Good luck finding a team for that.....only about 5 have cap space. Ohh and your return...you’ll be lucky if it’s more than a 6th.
Any deals you try to make you likrly need it cap neutral.
So in your opinion who's he bumping out of that top 6 then? The rookie who just scored 20 goals in 54 games? The guy who scored 40 goals last season? If you're going to make the statement and stand by it, elaborate. Looking at a chart listing team scoring and saying: "Look at the points he scored on my team he'd be your 3rd highest scorer" is a really lazy argument with very little substance to it.Great excuses. Do you want to hear mine about why your players wouldn't play on our team? No, you don't.
Two of your players had more points. He'd play in your top six. To suggest otherwise is ridiculous.
So in your opinion who's he bumping out of that top 6 then? The rookie who just scored 20 goals in 54 games? The guy who scored 40 goals last season? If you're going to make the statement and stand by it, elaborate. Looking at a chart listing team scoring and saying: "Look at the points he scored on my team he'd be your 3rd highest scorer" is a really lazy argument with very little substance to it.
So he's better than the guy that has out produced him every single year he's been in the league and who I'd add has fantastic metrics as well. I think you'd have a very hard time "manipulating" the numbers to demonstrate Buchnevich is a better player than Reinhart, but I'd love to see you try.I could play the same game with manipulating numbers. I won't.
I personally believe he'd be at least your second best winger. I think he's better than Reinhart. Buchnevich has never been carried by anyone. He doesn't play PP1, he doesn't play anywhere near the minutes Reinhart does, and he doesn't play with someone as good as Eichel. He has elite metrics. I'd argue beyond points he probably would've been your second best player last season. I used points as an objective measure.
Why do Rangers fans like Pekar so much? Chances are he never becomes half the player Lemieux is, and you want us to add to Lemieux.
I could play the same game with manipulating numbers. I won't.
I personally believe he'd be at least your second best winger. I think he's better than Reinhart. Buchnevich has never been carried by anyone. He doesn't play PP1, he doesn't play anywhere near the minutes Reinhart does, and he doesn't play with someone as good as Eichel. He has elite metrics. I'd argue beyond points he probably would've been your second best player last season. I used points as an objective measure.
So he's better than the guy that has out produced him every single year he's been in the league and who I'd add has fantastic metrics as well. I think you'd have a very hard time "manipulating" the numbers to demonstrate Buchnevich is a better player than Reinhart, but I'd love to see you try.
Pekar is like Marchand, but can play centre. Now whether he’ll do that at the NHL level or even be 75% of the player that Marchand is, is another story. But Sabres fans are high on him, because we need a shit disturber, so it makes sense why Rangers fans are too.
To me, I’m really high on him. Barring an overpayment for me, I wouldn’t trade him (as in Lemieux would be the addition, not the main return type overpayment, in this instance).
If he was playing in NYR's top 6, he either had Panarin or Zibanejad. Feel free to tell me more about how neither of those guys are anywhere near Eichel---I look forward to bringing it up next time an NYR fan starts an Eichel trade thread, because I distinctly remember you, in particular, claiming otherwise last go around.
Hey man I appreciate your optimism even though it's probably unfounded haha
This thread showcases every cliche about HFboards.
Awful, awful schoolyard dick-measuring 'discussion'